In Table 2, actual values of the sub-criteria for different WWTPs are presented. In order to calculate the weights of each sub-criterion, the normalized weights of 17 sub-criteria are calculated using pairwise comparison through the AHP method. The weight of each criterion (i.e., 4Rs) is then calculated as the summation of all the corresponding sub-criteria weights. These weights are normalized so that the summation of the weights for the 4Rs criteria would be 1. In Table 3, the weights (relative importance) of sub-criteria and criteria are presented. These weights are obtained by post-processing the weights assigned to the factors by the experts.
Actual values of sub-criteria for WWTP facilities
WWTP . | 1. Bowery Bay . | 2. Hunts Point . | 3. Tallman Island . | 4. Wards Island . | 5. Newtown Creek . | 6. North River . | 7. Oakwood Beach . | 8. Port Richmond . | 9. Red Hook . | 10. 26th Ward . | 11. Coney Island . | 12. Jamaica . | 13. Owls Head . | 14. Rockaway . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sub-criteria | ||||||||||||||
Hurricane flood elevation (Ra1) (ft) | 11.6 | 10.2 | 10.1 | 10.7 | 10 | 9.7 | 13.1 | 12.1 | 11.7 | 12.6 | 10.1 | 0 | 13.5 | 11.4 |
Adverse environmental impacts (Ra2) (-) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Plant capacity (Ra3) (MGD) | 150 | 200 | 80 | 275 | 310 | 170 | 39.9 | 60 | 60 | 85 | 110 | 100 | 120 | 45 |
Post-stress recovery (Ra4) (hour) | 0 | 30 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 14 | 167 | 17 | 0 | 30 | 112 | 0 | 16 | 180 |
Number of residents served (Ra5) (#) | 848,328 | 684,569 | 410,812 | 1,061,558 | 1,068,012 | 588,772 | 244,918 | 198,128 | 192,050 | 283,428 | 596,326 | 728,123 | 758,007 | 90,474 |
Additional load in flood time (Ro1) (MGD) | 150 | 200 | 40 | 275 | 390 | 170 | 80 | 60 | 60 | 85 | 110 | 100 | 120 | 45 |
Critical flood elevation (Ro2) (ft) | 15.5 | 17.5 | 15.5 | 17.5 | 13.5 | 12.5 | 16.5 | 14.5 | 14.5 | 13.5 | 15.5 | 13.5 | 14.5 | 14.5 |
Minimum inundation depth (Ro3) (ft) | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
Percent of not-at-risk equipment (Ro4) (%) | 0.64 | 0.45 | 0.66 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.66 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.99 | 0.71 | 0.62 |
DMR violations (Ro5) (%) | 0 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 2 | 1.9 | 0 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
Damage cost from the most severe historical hurricane (Ro6) ($) | 112.6 | 201.36 | 45.18 | 8.73 | 28.79 | 94.1 | 20.97 | 54.85 | 67.38 | 82.42 | 84.95 | 1.7 | 48.41 | 49.28 |
Number of plant technical staff (Rs1) (#) | 81 | 108 | 71 | 118 | 88 | 109 | 59 | 46 | 55 | 93 | 69 | 66 | 68 | 41 |
Availability of dewatering facilities (Rs2) (-) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total risk avoided for every single dollar (Rs3) ($) | 1.71 | 10.14 | 2.97 | 27.33 | 1.03 | 25.99 | 8.3 | 5.8 | 1.34 | 9.71 | 22.59 | 2.19 | 13.78 | 13.1 |
Existence of underground tunnel system (Rd1) (-) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Availability of WWTPs in the neighboring area (Rd2) (ft) | 2.47 | 3.75 | 3.87 | 5.08 | 6.76 | 6.46 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 4.27 | 6.04 | 10 | 6.04 | 8.19 | 8.61 |
On-site storage (Rd3) (ft3) | 6,415,897.6 | 0 | 2,231,592 | 14,445,321 | 0 | 16,254,252 | 1,475,604.9 | 9,177,280.9 | 4,290,165 | 0 | 0 | 1,588,950 | 2,037,387 | 53,459.34 |
WWTP . | 1. Bowery Bay . | 2. Hunts Point . | 3. Tallman Island . | 4. Wards Island . | 5. Newtown Creek . | 6. North River . | 7. Oakwood Beach . | 8. Port Richmond . | 9. Red Hook . | 10. 26th Ward . | 11. Coney Island . | 12. Jamaica . | 13. Owls Head . | 14. Rockaway . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sub-criteria | ||||||||||||||
Hurricane flood elevation (Ra1) (ft) | 11.6 | 10.2 | 10.1 | 10.7 | 10 | 9.7 | 13.1 | 12.1 | 11.7 | 12.6 | 10.1 | 0 | 13.5 | 11.4 |
Adverse environmental impacts (Ra2) (-) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Plant capacity (Ra3) (MGD) | 150 | 200 | 80 | 275 | 310 | 170 | 39.9 | 60 | 60 | 85 | 110 | 100 | 120 | 45 |
Post-stress recovery (Ra4) (hour) | 0 | 30 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 14 | 167 | 17 | 0 | 30 | 112 | 0 | 16 | 180 |
Number of residents served (Ra5) (#) | 848,328 | 684,569 | 410,812 | 1,061,558 | 1,068,012 | 588,772 | 244,918 | 198,128 | 192,050 | 283,428 | 596,326 | 728,123 | 758,007 | 90,474 |
Additional load in flood time (Ro1) (MGD) | 150 | 200 | 40 | 275 | 390 | 170 | 80 | 60 | 60 | 85 | 110 | 100 | 120 | 45 |
Critical flood elevation (Ro2) (ft) | 15.5 | 17.5 | 15.5 | 17.5 | 13.5 | 12.5 | 16.5 | 14.5 | 14.5 | 13.5 | 15.5 | 13.5 | 14.5 | 14.5 |
Minimum inundation depth (Ro3) (ft) | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
Percent of not-at-risk equipment (Ro4) (%) | 0.64 | 0.45 | 0.66 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.66 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.99 | 0.71 | 0.62 |
DMR violations (Ro5) (%) | 0 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 2 | 1.9 | 0 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
Damage cost from the most severe historical hurricane (Ro6) ($) | 112.6 | 201.36 | 45.18 | 8.73 | 28.79 | 94.1 | 20.97 | 54.85 | 67.38 | 82.42 | 84.95 | 1.7 | 48.41 | 49.28 |
Number of plant technical staff (Rs1) (#) | 81 | 108 | 71 | 118 | 88 | 109 | 59 | 46 | 55 | 93 | 69 | 66 | 68 | 41 |
Availability of dewatering facilities (Rs2) (-) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total risk avoided for every single dollar (Rs3) ($) | 1.71 | 10.14 | 2.97 | 27.33 | 1.03 | 25.99 | 8.3 | 5.8 | 1.34 | 9.71 | 22.59 | 2.19 | 13.78 | 13.1 |
Existence of underground tunnel system (Rd1) (-) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Availability of WWTPs in the neighboring area (Rd2) (ft) | 2.47 | 3.75 | 3.87 | 5.08 | 6.76 | 6.46 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 4.27 | 6.04 | 10 | 6.04 | 8.19 | 8.61 |
On-site storage (Rd3) (ft3) | 6,415,897.6 | 0 | 2,231,592 | 14,445,321 | 0 | 16,254,252 | 1,475,604.9 | 9,177,280.9 | 4,290,165 | 0 | 0 | 1,588,950 | 2,037,387 | 53,459.34 |
Weights of criteria and sub-criteria
Rapidity (Ra) . | Robustness (Ro) . | Resourcefulness (Rs) . | Redundancy (Rd) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRa = 0.302 . | WRo = 0.273 . | WRs = 0.205 . | WRd = 0.218 . | ||||
Ra1 | 0.083 | Ro1 | 0.046 | Rs1 | 0.037 | Rd1 | 0.065 |
Ra2 | 0.019 | Ro2 | 0.083 | Rs2 | 0.074 | Rd2 | 0.046 |
Ra3 | 0.083 | Ro3 | 0.028 | Rs3 | 0.028 | Rd3 | 0.037 |
Ra4 | 0.074 | Ro4 | 0.037 | ||||
Ra5 | 0.083 | Ro5 | 0.089 | ||||
Ro6 | 0.088 |
Rapidity (Ra) . | Robustness (Ro) . | Resourcefulness (Rs) . | Redundancy (Rd) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRa = 0.302 . | WRo = 0.273 . | WRs = 0.205 . | WRd = 0.218 . | ||||
Ra1 | 0.083 | Ro1 | 0.046 | Rs1 | 0.037 | Rd1 | 0.065 |
Ra2 | 0.019 | Ro2 | 0.083 | Rs2 | 0.074 | Rd2 | 0.046 |
Ra3 | 0.083 | Ro3 | 0.028 | Rs3 | 0.028 | Rd3 | 0.037 |
Ra4 | 0.074 | Ro4 | 0.037 | ||||
Ra5 | 0.083 | Ro5 | 0.089 | ||||
Ro6 | 0.088 |