The system configurations in Figure 1(b) and 1(c) are firstly used for numerical validations of the proposed TFR-based leak detection method, with the system parameter settings and information given in Table 1. Different leakage cases (location and size) are considered for each test system and shown in Table 2, with tests no. 1 to no. 3 for the branched pipe system and tests no. 4 to no. 7 for the simple looped pipe system. For clarity, the relative leak effective area, AL* = CdAL/Ap with CdAL being leaking area and Ap the cross-sectional area of leaking pipe, for each test case is also listed in the table for reference. The system transient responses are obtained by the 1D numerical simulations in the time domain (i.e. Equations (1) and (2)). The transient pressure head at the just upstream of the inline valve are collected and then converted by Fourier transform into the frequency domain for the analysis. The results of leakage detection based on the proposed method and procedure in this study are obtained and listed in Table 2. The accuracy of the method is evaluated by the difference between the real and predicted values of the leakage information, which is defined as the relative error (ɛ) by:
formula
9
Table 1

Settings and information of test pipeline systems

SystemPipe length (m)Pipe size (mm)Wave speed (m/s)Pipe friction
No. 2 (branched) l1 = 500, l2=240; l3 = 200 D1 = 500, D2=300; D3 = 60 a1 = 1,000, a2=1,100; a3 = 1,200 f1 = f2 = f3=0.01 
No. 3 (looped) l1 = 500, l2=300; l3 = 200; l4 = 350 D1 = 500, D2=400; D3 = 500; D4 = 200 a1 = 1,000, a2=1,100; a3 = 1,000; a4 = 1,200 f1 = f2 = f3=f4=0.01 
SystemPipe length (m)Pipe size (mm)Wave speed (m/s)Pipe friction
No. 2 (branched) l1 = 500, l2=240; l3 = 200 D1 = 500, D2=300; D3 = 60 a1 = 1,000, a2=1,100; a3 = 1,200 f1 = f2 = f3=0.01 
No. 3 (looped) l1 = 500, l2=300; l3 = 200; l4 = 350 D1 = 500, D2=400; D3 = 500; D4 = 200 a1 = 1,000, a2=1,100; a3 = 1,000; a4 = 1,200 f1 = f2 = f3=f4=0.01 
Table 2

Leakage detection results for branched and looped systems

SystemTest no.Real leakage information
Results of leakage detection
xLn (m)KL (10–4 m2/s)AL* (10−3)xLnP (m)ε (%)KLP (10–4 m2/s)ε (%)
Branched pipeline system 150 (n = 1) 1.0 1.6 146 –2.7 0.83 –17 
100 (n = 2) 3.0 13.6 101 1.0 2.84 –5.3 
160 (n = 3) 0.2 22.6 167 4.4 0.19 –5.0 
Looped pipeline system 300 (n = 1) 3.0 4.9 281 –6.3 2.68 –10.7 
120 (n = 2) 1.0 2.5 124 3.3 0.97 –3 
150 (n = 3) 4.0 6.5 169 12.7 3.69 –7.8 
100 (n = 4) 0.8 8.1 113 13 0.58 27.5 
SystemTest no.Real leakage information
Results of leakage detection
xLn (m)KL (10–4 m2/s)AL* (10−3)xLnP (m)ε (%)KLP (10–4 m2/s)ε (%)
Branched pipeline system 150 (n = 1) 1.0 1.6 146 –2.7 0.83 –17 
100 (n = 2) 3.0 13.6 101 1.0 2.84 –5.3 
160 (n = 3) 0.2 22.6 167 4.4 0.19 –5.0 
Looped pipeline system 300 (n = 1) 3.0 4.9 281 –6.3 2.68 –10.7 
120 (n = 2) 1.0 2.5 124 3.3 0.97 –3 
150 (n = 3) 4.0 6.5 169 12.7 3.69 –7.8 
100 (n = 4) 0.8 8.1 113 13 0.58 27.5 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal