Summary of the operational conditions for SBR1 (static anaerobic feeding) and SBR2 (plug-flow feeding) along the experimental periods, regarding feed composition and anaerobic phase duration in SBR2 (E1 – Emsize; Ac – Acetate; AR14 – Acid Red 14)
Period . | Days . | Feed composition (SBR1 and SBR2) . | SBR2 anaerobic phase . | F/M (gCOD gVSS−1 d−1) . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Substrate (mg O2 L−1) . | AR14 (mg L−1) . | Filling (min) . | Stirring (min) . | SBR1 . | SBR2 . | ||
A | 0–157 | E1 - 1000 | 40 | 50 | 90 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
B | 158–164 | E1 - 1000 | 120 | 0.5 | 0.4 | ||
C | 165–172 | E1 - 3000 | 120 | 1.2 | 0.9 | ||
A’ | 173–179 | E1 - 1000 | 40 | 0.6 | 0.5 | ||
D | 180–255 | E1 - 1000 | 40 | 80 | 60 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
E | 256–291 | 50% E1 + 50% Ac - 1000 | 40 | 1.1 | 0.5 | ||
F | 292–315 | Ac - 1000 | 40 | 1.8 | 1.0 |
Period . | Days . | Feed composition (SBR1 and SBR2) . | SBR2 anaerobic phase . | F/M (gCOD gVSS−1 d−1) . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Substrate (mg O2 L−1) . | AR14 (mg L−1) . | Filling (min) . | Stirring (min) . | SBR1 . | SBR2 . | ||
A | 0–157 | E1 - 1000 | 40 | 50 | 90 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
B | 158–164 | E1 - 1000 | 120 | 0.5 | 0.4 | ||
C | 165–172 | E1 - 3000 | 120 | 1.2 | 0.9 | ||
A’ | 173–179 | E1 - 1000 | 40 | 0.6 | 0.5 | ||
D | 180–255 | E1 - 1000 | 40 | 80 | 60 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
E | 256–291 | 50% E1 + 50% Ac - 1000 | 40 | 1.1 | 0.5 | ||
F | 292–315 | Ac - 1000 | 40 | 1.8 | 1.0 |
The indicated food-to-microorganism ratio (F/M) was calculated for each period, taking into account the respective feed COD and average VSS.
Schematic representation of the SBRs used in this study employing two different feeding strategies: SBR1 had an anaerobic static feeding, followed by a stirred anaerobic phase and an aerobic stage; SBR2 had an anaerobic plug-flow feeding stage through the sludge bed, followed by a stirred anaerobic phase and an aerobic stage. The dashed arrows represent the feed flow pattern in each SBR.
Schematic representation of the SBRs used in this study employing two different feeding strategies: SBR1 had an anaerobic static feeding, followed by a stirred anaerobic phase and an aerobic stage; SBR2 had an anaerobic plug-flow feeding stage through the sludge bed, followed by a stirred anaerobic phase and an aerobic stage. The dashed arrows represent the feed flow pattern in each SBR.