Table 5

Multinomial logistic regression model using improved pit latrine as the reference category (n = 1,198)

VariablenWater-based technologies
Ecological sanitation
Unimproved pit latrine
RRRp-value95% conf.intRRRp-value95% conf.intRRRp-value95% conf.int
Accepted/rejected the loan offer 
 Rejected the loan offer (ref) 615          
 Accepted the loan offer 583 12.3 <0.001 7.5–20.2 21.2 <0.001 14.6–30.8 0.969 0.000 
Household wealth status 
 Quintile 3 (ref) 214          
 Quintile 1 (lowest) 235 0.4 0.07 0.2–1.1 1.1 0.81 0.6–1.8 3.3 0.01 1.3–8.0 
 Quintile 2 275 0.4 0.01 0.2–0.8 0.8 0.26 0.5–1.2 0.8 0.72 0.3–2.2 
 Quintile 4 243 1.5 0.23 0.8–2.9 0.8 0.32 0.4–1.3 1.1 0.90 0.3–4.4 
 Quintile 5 (highest) 231 1.4 0.36 0.7–3.1 1.2 0.67 0.6–2.2 0.99 0.000 
Type of pit latrine in use 
 Unimproved pit latrine (ref) 345          
 Improved pit latrine 853 1.3 0.43 0.7–2.6 1.1 0.79 0.7–1.6 0.0 <0.001 0.01–0.1 
Concern about space for sanitation 
 No concern (ref) 891          
 Concerned about space for sanitation 307 1.0 0.95 0.6–1.6 1.1 0.62 0.8–1.6 0.5 0.15 0.2–1.3 
Number of households at a plot 
 One household (ref) 376          
 2–3 households 410 0.7 0.19 0.4–1.2 0.8 0.29 0.5–1.2 1.4 0.37 0.7–2.9 
 Over 3 households 412 0.6 0.08 0.4–1.1 0.7 0.10 0.5–1.1 0.7 0.33 0.3–1.5 
Access to a garden for food crop production 
 No access to a garden (ref) 792          
 Had access to a garden 406 0.7 0.19 0.4–1.2 1.2 0.23 0.9–1.7 0.9 0.65 0.5–1.6 
Knowledge about ecosan 
 No prior knowledge (ref) 392          
 Had prior knowledge 806 0.8 0.28 0.5–1.2 1.8 0.00 1.2–2.5 0.5 0.03 0.3–0.9 
Source of drinking water 
 Communal water kiosk 777          
 Had piped water on the yard 421 0.7 0.33 0.4–1.3 1.3 0.33 0.8–2.0 1.6 0.33 0.6–4.3 
 Constant  0.1 <0.001 0.03–0.2 0.1 <0.001 0.03–0.1 0.9 0.80 0.2–3.0 
VariablenWater-based technologies
Ecological sanitation
Unimproved pit latrine
RRRp-value95% conf.intRRRp-value95% conf.intRRRp-value95% conf.int
Accepted/rejected the loan offer 
 Rejected the loan offer (ref) 615          
 Accepted the loan offer 583 12.3 <0.001 7.5–20.2 21.2 <0.001 14.6–30.8 0.969 0.000 
Household wealth status 
 Quintile 3 (ref) 214          
 Quintile 1 (lowest) 235 0.4 0.07 0.2–1.1 1.1 0.81 0.6–1.8 3.3 0.01 1.3–8.0 
 Quintile 2 275 0.4 0.01 0.2–0.8 0.8 0.26 0.5–1.2 0.8 0.72 0.3–2.2 
 Quintile 4 243 1.5 0.23 0.8–2.9 0.8 0.32 0.4–1.3 1.1 0.90 0.3–4.4 
 Quintile 5 (highest) 231 1.4 0.36 0.7–3.1 1.2 0.67 0.6–2.2 0.99 0.000 
Type of pit latrine in use 
 Unimproved pit latrine (ref) 345          
 Improved pit latrine 853 1.3 0.43 0.7–2.6 1.1 0.79 0.7–1.6 0.0 <0.001 0.01–0.1 
Concern about space for sanitation 
 No concern (ref) 891          
 Concerned about space for sanitation 307 1.0 0.95 0.6–1.6 1.1 0.62 0.8–1.6 0.5 0.15 0.2–1.3 
Number of households at a plot 
 One household (ref) 376          
 2–3 households 410 0.7 0.19 0.4–1.2 0.8 0.29 0.5–1.2 1.4 0.37 0.7–2.9 
 Over 3 households 412 0.6 0.08 0.4–1.1 0.7 0.10 0.5–1.1 0.7 0.33 0.3–1.5 
Access to a garden for food crop production 
 No access to a garden (ref) 792          
 Had access to a garden 406 0.7 0.19 0.4–1.2 1.2 0.23 0.9–1.7 0.9 0.65 0.5–1.6 
Knowledge about ecosan 
 No prior knowledge (ref) 392          
 Had prior knowledge 806 0.8 0.28 0.5–1.2 1.8 0.00 1.2–2.5 0.5 0.03 0.3–0.9 
Source of drinking water 
 Communal water kiosk 777          
 Had piped water on the yard 421 0.7 0.33 0.4–1.3 1.3 0.33 0.8–2.0 1.6 0.33 0.6–4.3 
 Constant  0.1 <0.001 0.03–0.2 0.1 <0.001 0.03–0.1 0.9 0.80 0.2–3.0 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal