Comparison of: Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) (dimensionless); NSE change of contagion-adjusted values minus original CN values (dimensionless); root mean square error (RMSE)-standard deviation ratio (RSR) (dimensionless); percent bias (PBIAS) (mm); Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) (dimensionless); mean squared error (MSE) (mm); relative correlation coefficient (RCC) (%); monthly runoff (MRO) (%); and monthly carryover (MCO) (%) values between blended original (ORG) CN and blended contagion (CON)-adjusted CN monthly streamflow models for the RR HUC-8 watershed
| Model run . | NSE . | NSE change . | RSR . | PBIAS (mm) . | AIC . | MSE (mm) . | RCC (%) . | MRO (%) . | MCO (%) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blended ORG CN RR HUC-8 | 0.708 | +0.025 | 0.540 | –19.31 | 7.067 | 1,128.46 | 113.42 | 60 | 40 |
| Blended CON-Adjusted CN RR HUC-8 | 0.733 | 0.516 | –15.10 | 6.977 | 1,031.73 | 121.52 | 61 | 39 |
| Model run . | NSE . | NSE change . | RSR . | PBIAS (mm) . | AIC . | MSE (mm) . | RCC (%) . | MRO (%) . | MCO (%) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blended ORG CN RR HUC-8 | 0.708 | +0.025 | 0.540 | –19.31 | 7.067 | 1,128.46 | 113.42 | 60 | 40 |
| Blended CON-Adjusted CN RR HUC-8 | 0.733 | 0.516 | –15.10 | 6.977 | 1,031.73 | 121.52 | 61 | 39 |