Skip to Main Content
Table 1

Performance summary for streamflow simulation skills

 Calibration (1980–1982)
Validation (1988–1990)
p-factorr-factorKGEMeanaSTDap-factorr-factorKGEMeanaSTDa
Observation – – – 0.33 0.49 – – – 0.49 0.79 
Gauge 0.84 1.54 0.72 0.35 0.45 0.72 1.07 0.67 0.53 0.70 
CFSR 0.68 1.35 0.43 0.33 0.66 0.59 0.89 0.63 0.48 0.72 
WATCH 0.75 1.24 0.63 0.32 0.47 0.75 1.5 0.66 0.49 0.91 
 Calibration (1980–1982)
Validation (1988–1990)
p-factorr-factorKGEMeanaSTDap-factorr-factorKGEMeanaSTDa
Observation – – – 0.33 0.49 – – – 0.49 0.79 
Gauge 0.84 1.54 0.72 0.35 0.45 0.72 1.07 0.67 0.53 0.70 
CFSR 0.68 1.35 0.43 0.33 0.66 0.59 0.89 0.63 0.48 0.72 
WATCH 0.75 1.24 0.63 0.32 0.47 0.75 1.5 0.66 0.49 0.91 

ain mm d−1; KGE and STD denote Kling and Gupta efficiency and standard deviation, respectively.

p- and r-factors quantify the percentage of observed streamflow bracketed in the 95% prediction uncertainly (95PPU) along with the average band width, respectively

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal