IWA Publishing

Table 2

Evaluation indices, weights and dependence levels at the sources of the Tarim River

Index	Aksu		Kashgar		Hotan		Sanyuanliu		Weight
Index	Actual value	Dependence level	Actual value	Dependence level	Actual value	Dependence level	Actual value	Dependence level	Weight
P1	12.10	IV	11.63	III	11.86	III	11.81	III	0.0708
P2	12.98	I	19.40	I	11.50	I	15.54	I	0.0870
P3	8,190.00	II	4,508.14	III	2,891.75	IV	5,197.88	III	0.0783
P4	3,420.25	IV	2,180.75	IV	5,975.50	II	3,389.01	IV	0.0806
P5	4,423.50	II	2,834.25	III	2,233.75	IV	3,137.64	III	0.0804
P6	69.15	IV	57.56	IV	38.77	IV	63.03	IV	0.0702
P7	44.18	III	56.83	III	24.88	II	38.72	III	0.0742
P8	130.92	IV	133.72	IV	38.70	II	93.83	IV	0.1055
P9	15.84	II	25.04	III	10.65	II	15.10	II	0.0708
P10	92.89	IV	100.25	IV	93.77	IV	96.42	IV	0.0791
P11	0.06	Bad IV	1.15	IV	7.28	I	1.71	IV	0.0967
P12	20.50	II	21.04	II	39.35	III	26.96	III	0.1064

Index	Aksu		Kashgar		Hotan		Sanyuanliu		Weight
Index	Actual value	Dependence level	Actual value	Dependence level	Actual value	Dependence level	Actual value	Dependence level	Weight
P1	12.10	IV	11.63	III	11.86	III	11.81	III	0.0708
P2	12.98	I	19.40	I	11.50	I	15.54	I	0.0870
P3	8,190.00	II	4,508.14	III	2,891.75	IV	5,197.88	III	0.0783
P4	3,420.25	IV	2,180.75	IV	5,975.50	II	3,389.01	IV	0.0806
P5	4,423.50	II	2,834.25	III	2,233.75	IV	3,137.64	III	0.0804
P6	69.15	IV	57.56	IV	38.77	IV	63.03	IV	0.0702
P7	44.18	III	56.83	III	24.88	II	38.72	III	0.0742
P8	130.92	IV	133.72	IV	38.70	II	93.83	IV	0.1055
P9	15.84	II	25.04	III	10.65	II	15.10	II	0.0708
P10	92.89	IV	100.25	IV	93.77	IV	96.42	IV	0.0791
P11	0.06	Bad IV	1.15	IV	7.28	I	1.71	IV	0.0967
P12	20.50	II	21.04	II	39.35	III	26.96	III	0.1064

Note: the main data source is from the Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and the literature.