Performance rating of hydrological models for recommended statistics at monthly time step
Performance rating . | Moriasi et al. (2007) . | Parajuli (2010) . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RSR . | NSE . | PBIAS % . | R2 value . | |
Excellent | – | – | – | >0.90 |
Very good | 0.00 ≤ RSR ≤ 0.5 | 0.75 ≤ NSE ≤ 1.00 | |PBIAS| < 10 | 0.75–0.89 |
Good | 0.5 < RSR ≤ 0.6 | 0.65 < NSE ≤ 0.75 | 10 < |PBIAS| ≤ 15 | 0.50–0.74 |
Satisfactory | 0.6 < RSR ≤ 0.7 | 0.5 < NSE ≤ 0.65 | 15 < |PBIAS| ≤ 25 | 0.25–0.49 (Fair) |
Unsatisfactory | RSR > 0.7 | NSE < 0.5 | |PBIAS| > 25 | 0–0.24 (Poor) |
Performance rating . | Moriasi et al. (2007) . | Parajuli (2010) . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RSR . | NSE . | PBIAS % . | R2 value . | |
Excellent | – | – | – | >0.90 |
Very good | 0.00 ≤ RSR ≤ 0.5 | 0.75 ≤ NSE ≤ 1.00 | |PBIAS| < 10 | 0.75–0.89 |
Good | 0.5 < RSR ≤ 0.6 | 0.65 < NSE ≤ 0.75 | 10 < |PBIAS| ≤ 15 | 0.50–0.74 |
Satisfactory | 0.6 < RSR ≤ 0.7 | 0.5 < NSE ≤ 0.65 | 15 < |PBIAS| ≤ 25 | 0.25–0.49 (Fair) |
Unsatisfactory | RSR > 0.7 | NSE < 0.5 | |PBIAS| > 25 | 0–0.24 (Poor) |