Table 4 shows the structural changes in strategy 3 in which growing traditional crops will no longer be profitable. In this strategy, farmers ultimately sell their business and the land will be economically exploited in other ways. According to the authors, this strategy only differs from strategy 2 with regard to the necessary socio-cultural changes in the economic domain in the sense that it does not imply a new consumer market. It does however imply a same discourse change as in strategy 2, namely that farmers themselves are responsible for the way they deal with a lack of fresh water instead of the government.
Institutional and socio-cultural analysis of strategy 3 (Current policy → Efficient water use → Land use change)
Domain . | Structure . | Structure elements of strategy 3 . | Actors . | Governance level of complexity . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Institutional |
|
|
|
|
Social |
|
|
|
|
Economic |
| Switch to other exploitation of land | Entrepreneurs | 1 |
Knowledge | Research programs Simulation/forecasting software tech |
Domain . | Structure . | Structure elements of strategy 3 . | Actors . | Governance level of complexity . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Institutional |
|
|
|
|
Social |
|
|
|
|
Economic |
| Switch to other exploitation of land | Entrepreneurs | 1 |
Knowledge | Research programs Simulation/forecasting software tech |