Skip to Main Content
Table 4

Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (NSE), and residual % bias (after bias-correction), between the observed and simulated TP and DOC for the days when the observed data are available

ConstituentRiverDefault method
Method 1
Method 2
Method 3
NSEResidual % biasNSEResidual % biasNSEResidual % biasNSEResidual % bias
TP Hay 0.79 4.0 0.79 4.1 0.83 − 1.6 0.83 − 1.6 
Liard 0.62 −11.3 0.63 12.2 0.63 −2.6 0.64 1.9 
Peel 0.71 21.3 0.74 18.6 0.82 1.3 0.85 − 1.0 
DOC Hay 0.95 −0.4 0.95 0.4 0.95 0.1 0.96 0.2 
Liard 0.77 3.4 0.72 0.4 0.77 0.4 0.79 0.4 
Peel 0.74 7.0 0.73 7.1 0.73 0.1 0.75 0.2 
ConstituentRiverDefault method
Method 1
Method 2
Method 3
NSEResidual % biasNSEResidual % biasNSEResidual % biasNSEResidual % bias
TP Hay 0.79 4.0 0.79 4.1 0.83 − 1.6 0.83 − 1.6 
Liard 0.62 −11.3 0.63 12.2 0.63 −2.6 0.64 1.9 
Peel 0.71 21.3 0.74 18.6 0.82 1.3 0.85 − 1.0 
DOC Hay 0.95 −0.4 0.95 0.4 0.95 0.1 0.96 0.2 
Liard 0.77 3.4 0.72 0.4 0.77 0.4 0.79 0.4 
Peel 0.74 7.0 0.73 7.1 0.73 0.1 0.75 0.2 

Note: Values in bold indicate the best performance. The details on the four methods are given in Table 2.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal