Skip to Main Content
Table 1

Antifouling performance comparison between this work and other modified membranes

MembranePure water flux (L/m2 h)Organic feedRejection (%)FRR (%)Reference
Ag/SiO2-modified PVDF ∼410 0.2 g/L BSA 75 50.2 Pan et al. (2016)  
GO-modified PVDF 166 0.1 g/L BSA 84 92 Zhang et al. (2013)  
PU-modified PVDF ∼169 1.0 g/L BSA 88 93 et al. (2016)  
CNC-modified PVDF 40 0.2 g/L BSA 82 ∼79 Lv et al. (2018)  
HEA-grafted PVDF 486 0.1 g/L SA – 92 Shen et al. (2018)  
PVC-PEGMA blended PVC 461 2 g/L SA 94 80 Wu et al. (2018)  
PHFBM-PMAA-PMTAC PVDF 120 0.1 g/L yeast 99 94 Wang et al. (2019)  
PBI-modified PSF 355 0.05 M BSA ∼69 ∼93 Eren et al. (2015)  
PVDF/PPG-PEG-PPG (M4171 0.2 g/L BSA 95 94 In this work 
PVDF/PPG-PEG-PPG (M4164 0.2 g/L SA 99 90.8 In this work 
PVDF/PPG-PEG-PPG (M4182 0.2 g/L yeast 99 93.2 In this work 
MembranePure water flux (L/m2 h)Organic feedRejection (%)FRR (%)Reference
Ag/SiO2-modified PVDF ∼410 0.2 g/L BSA 75 50.2 Pan et al. (2016)  
GO-modified PVDF 166 0.1 g/L BSA 84 92 Zhang et al. (2013)  
PU-modified PVDF ∼169 1.0 g/L BSA 88 93 et al. (2016)  
CNC-modified PVDF 40 0.2 g/L BSA 82 ∼79 Lv et al. (2018)  
HEA-grafted PVDF 486 0.1 g/L SA – 92 Shen et al. (2018)  
PVC-PEGMA blended PVC 461 2 g/L SA 94 80 Wu et al. (2018)  
PHFBM-PMAA-PMTAC PVDF 120 0.1 g/L yeast 99 94 Wang et al. (2019)  
PBI-modified PSF 355 0.05 M BSA ∼69 ∼93 Eren et al. (2015)  
PVDF/PPG-PEG-PPG (M4171 0.2 g/L BSA 95 94 In this work 
PVDF/PPG-PEG-PPG (M4164 0.2 g/L SA 99 90.8 In this work 
PVDF/PPG-PEG-PPG (M4182 0.2 g/L yeast 99 93.2 In this work 

GO, graphene oxide; PU, polyurethane; CNC, cellulose nanocrystal; HEA, hydroxyethyl acrylate; PVC, polyvinyl chloride; PEGMA, poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate; PHFBM-PMAA-PMTAC, poly(hexafluorobutyl methacrylate)-poly(methacrylic acid)-poly[(2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl) trimethyl ammonium chloride]; PBI, poly[2,2′-(m-phenylene)-5,5′-dibenzimidazole]; PSF, polysulfone.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal