Skip to Main Content
Table 2

Comparison of Phoslock® and Phoslock®-like materials

MaterialsCapacity (mg g−1)ShapeReplaceabilityReference
Phoslock® (LMB) 9.5 powder × Haghseresht et al. (2009)  
Phoslock® (LMB) 9.8 powder × Zamparas et al. (2015)  
NT-25La (LMB) 14 powder × Kuroki et al. (2014)  
La-AC fiber 15.3 granule × Zhang et al. (2012)  
La-MCM-41 23.78 particle × Yang et al. (2011)  
La-silica SBA-15 29.08 particle × Yang et al. (2011)  
La-chelex-100 1.3–3.0 particle × Wu et al. (2007)  
MNB 10.58 membraniform √ This study 
MaterialsCapacity (mg g−1)ShapeReplaceabilityReference
Phoslock® (LMB) 9.5 powder × Haghseresht et al. (2009)  
Phoslock® (LMB) 9.8 powder × Zamparas et al. (2015)  
NT-25La (LMB) 14 powder × Kuroki et al. (2014)  
La-AC fiber 15.3 granule × Zhang et al. (2012)  
La-MCM-41 23.78 particle × Yang et al. (2011)  
La-silica SBA-15 29.08 particle × Yang et al. (2011)  
La-chelex-100 1.3–3.0 particle × Wu et al. (2007)  
MNB 10.58 membraniform √ This study 

AC, activated carbon; MCM, a mesoporous material synthesized from cetyltrimethylammonium bromide; SBA, a mesoporous silica synthesized from a triblock copolymer Pluronic P123 and tetraethyl orthosilicate.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal