Case study 1: energy costs [€] for each of the VTL control solutions shown in Figure 2
| . | Exponent of the power law relationship characterizing the trigger levels . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 . | 1 . | 0.5 . | |||||
| Maximum and minimum levels at the time instants tpeakstart and tpeakend | 50% – 50% | (a) | 44.3 | (b) | 43.2 | (c) | 42.5 |
| 75% – 25% | (d) | 41.0 | (e) | 40.7 | (f) | 39.9 | |
| 90% – 10% | (g) | 38.8 | (h) | 38.7 | (i) | 38.0 | |
| . | Exponent of the power law relationship characterizing the trigger levels . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 . | 1 . | 0.5 . | |||||
| Maximum and minimum levels at the time instants tpeakstart and tpeakend | 50% – 50% | (a) | 44.3 | (b) | 43.2 | (c) | 42.5 |
| 75% – 25% | (d) | 41.0 | (e) | 40.7 | (f) | 39.9 | |
| 90% – 10% | (g) | 38.8 | (h) | 38.7 | (i) | 38.0 | |
Note: Each value reported in the table and indicated with a letter from (a) to (i) refers to the corresponding case of Figure 2.