Regulatory approaches used across case studies
Management area . | Regulatory approaches . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Setting reduction targetsa . | Stormwater management . | Wastewater management . | Ban on winter manure spreading . | Wetland no-net loss policy . | Numeric nutrient criteriab . | |
Murray–Darling basin | • | • | • | |||
Lake Winnipeg Manitoba | • | • | • | • | • | |
Lake Simcoe | • | • | • | • | • | |
Prince Edward Island | • | • | ||||
Lake Erie | • | • | • | • | • | |
Lake Taihu | •b | • | • | • | •b | |
Brittany | • | • | • | • | • | • |
Lake Léman | • | • | • | • | • | • |
Chesapeake Bay watershed | • | • | • | • | c | |
Gulf of Mexico Arkansas | • | • | • | |||
Iowa | • | • | • | • | ||
State of Oregon | • | • |
Management area . | Regulatory approaches . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Setting reduction targetsa . | Stormwater management . | Wastewater management . | Ban on winter manure spreading . | Wetland no-net loss policy . | Numeric nutrient criteriab . | |
Murray–Darling basin | • | • | • | |||
Lake Winnipeg Manitoba | • | • | • | • | • | |
Lake Simcoe | • | • | • | • | • | |
Prince Edward Island | • | • | ||||
Lake Erie | • | • | • | • | • | |
Lake Taihu | •b | • | • | • | •b | |
Brittany | • | • | • | • | • | • |
Lake Léman | • | • | • | • | • | • |
Chesapeake Bay watershed | • | • | • | • | c | |
Gulf of Mexico Arkansas | • | • | • | |||
Iowa | • | • | • | • | ||
State of Oregon | • | • |
aThis issue is discussed, but we cannot ascertain that reduction targets are required by law.
bTypically what this means is that the jurisdiction has defined N/P numerical criteria for at least one class of water. With that logic, jurisdiction that uses N/P criteria based on a reduction program (including through TMDLs) do not fit in that category. Implementation details for the whole USA can be found at https://www.epa.gov/nutrient-policy-data/state-progress-toward-developing-numeric-nutrient-water-quality-criteria. One can note that Florida, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, and Oregon are using chlorophyll-a concentrations as a standard that can be used to determine if waters are impaired due to nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. China has a 10 mg/L limit for nitrate (N-NO3−) for both drinking water and surface water standards, but no numerical criteria for phosphorus.
cAlthough the whole watershed does not have a no-net loss wetland policy, at least Virginia and Maryland do.