Skip to Main Content
Table 3

Comparison between the obtained results and the existing ones of the three cross-sections of El-Sheikh Gaber canal

Cross-sectionMethodGeometric elements
V (m/s)Q (Equation (5)) (m3/s)C (Equation (1)) (LE/m)Saving in C (Equation (1))
b (m)y (m)m
PSOa 10.104 7.787 1.003 1.147 160.0 8.4 × 107 41.25% 
Existing designb 40.0 4.4 0.998 233.526 14.3 × 107 
PSOa 7.301 6.203 1.004 1.334 112.0 2.4 × 104 25.0% 
Existing designb 22.0 3.6 1.183 124.353 3.2 × 104 
PSOa 6.544 5.637 1.217 1.271 96.0 2.2 × 104 27.67% 
Existing designb 20.0 3.6 1.171 114.659 3 × 104 
Cross-sectionMethodGeometric elements
V (m/s)Q (Equation (5)) (m3/s)C (Equation (1)) (LE/m)Saving in C (Equation (1))
b (m)y (m)m
PSOa 10.104 7.787 1.003 1.147 160.0 8.4 × 107 41.25% 
Existing designb 40.0 4.4 0.998 233.526 14.3 × 107 
PSOa 7.301 6.203 1.004 1.334 112.0 2.4 × 104 25.0% 
Existing designb 22.0 3.6 1.183 124.353 3.2 × 104 
PSOa 6.544 5.637 1.217 1.271 96.0 2.2 × 104 27.67% 
Existing designb 20.0 3.6 1.171 114.659 3 × 104 

aPresent study.

bGabr (2018).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal