IWA Publishing

Table 5

Relative performance of spring based on normalized mass spring flow for two short and one long period for Danda springs

S. no.	Spring no.	June 01 to May 05	June 05 to May 13	June 01 to May 13	June 01 to May 05	June 05 to May 13	June 01 to May 13
1	01	−0.79	0.98	0.04	Bad	Good	Good
2	02	−0.91	0.82	−0.31	Bad	Good	Bad
3	03	−1.14	2.74	0.59	Bad	Good	Good
4	4A	−0.43	0.56	−0.31	Bad	Good	Bad
5	4B	1.09	1.79	2.77	Good	Good	Good
6	05	−0.53	1.01	0.32	Bad	Good	Good
7	06	0.12	0.20	0.05	Good	Good	Good
8	07	−1.52	−1.38	−3.40	Bad	Bad	Bad
9	08	NA	0.78	0.78	NA	Good	Good
10	09	−3.54	−0.21	−4.34	Bad	Bad	Bad
11	10A	−1.21	0.00	−1.48	Bad	Bad	Bad
12	11	−0.64	−0.33	−1.10	Bad	Bad	Bad
13	13	2.56	3.53	5.95	Good	Good	Good
14	14	−1.59	0.64	−1.19	Bad	Good	Bad
15	15	0.26	1.23	1.07	Good	Good	Good
16	16	0.44	0.78	1.10	Good	Good	Good
17	17	NA	1.15	1.15	NA	Good	Good

S. no.	Spring no.	June 01 to May 05	June 05 to May 13	June 01 to May 13	June 01 to May 05	June 05 to May 13	June 01 to May 13
1	01	−0.79	0.98	0.04	Bad	Good	Good
2	02	−0.91	0.82	−0.31	Bad	Good	Bad
3	03	−1.14	2.74	0.59	Bad	Good	Good
4	4A	−0.43	0.56	−0.31	Bad	Good	Bad
5	4B	1.09	1.79	2.77	Good	Good	Good
6	05	−0.53	1.01	0.32	Bad	Good	Good
7	06	0.12	0.20	0.05	Good	Good	Good
8	07	−1.52	−1.38	−3.40	Bad	Bad	Bad
9	08	NA	0.78	0.78	NA	Good	Good
10	09	−3.54	−0.21	−4.34	Bad	Bad	Bad
11	10A	−1.21	0.00	−1.48	Bad	Bad	Bad
12	11	−0.64	−0.33	−1.10	Bad	Bad	Bad
13	13	2.56	3.53	5.95	Good	Good	Good
14	14	−1.59	0.64	−1.19	Bad	Good	Bad
15	15	0.26	1.23	1.07	Good	Good	Good
16	16	0.44	0.78	1.10	Good	Good	Good
17	17	NA	1.15	1.15	NA	Good	Good