IWA Publishing

Skip to Main Content

Table 3

Bifenthrin factorial experimental design results

Samples	Photoperiod	Inoculum (%)	Biomass (mg L⁻¹)	GC-MS bifenthrin (%)
Samples	Photoperiod	Inoculum (%)	Biomass (mg L⁻¹)	Biomass	Aqueous phase	Glass deposits	Degradation
Sample 1	12:12	10	212.50 ± 16.54	3.76 ± 0.71	0.87 ± 0.35	1.09 ± 0.10	94.28 ± 0.70
Sample 2	12:12	20	418.75 ± 43.75	4.79 ± 1.06	0.95 ± 0.28	1.54 ± 0.60	92.72 ± 0.56
Control 3	12:12	0	<LOD	<LOD	39.73 ± 1.51	9.96 ± 0.18	50.32 ± 1.49
Blank 4	12:12	10	210.00 ± 20.34	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD
Blank 5	12:12	20	387.67 ± 34.87	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD
Sample 6	18:6	10	341.67 ± 3.61	3.42 ± 1.05	0.90 ± 0.19	0.71 ± 0.03	94.96 ± 1.20
Sample 7	18:6	20	435.42 ± 23.66	2.90 ± 0.78	0.58 ± 0.30	0.33 ± 0.05	96.19 ± 0.76
Control 8	18:6	0	<LOD	<LOD	15.07 ± 2.69	7.28 ± 2.25	77.65 ± 1.24
Blank 9	18:6	10	339.00 ± 5.60	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD
Blank 10	18:6	20	440.65 ± 17.56	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD

Samples	Photoperiod	Inoculum (%)	Biomass (mg L⁻¹)	GC-MS bifenthrin (%)
Samples	Photoperiod	Inoculum (%)	Biomass (mg L⁻¹)	Biomass	Aqueous phase	Glass deposits	Degradation
Sample 1	12:12	10	212.50 ± 16.54	3.76 ± 0.71	0.87 ± 0.35	1.09 ± 0.10	94.28 ± 0.70
Sample 2	12:12	20	418.75 ± 43.75	4.79 ± 1.06	0.95 ± 0.28	1.54 ± 0.60	92.72 ± 0.56
Control 3	12:12	0	<LOD	<LOD	39.73 ± 1.51	9.96 ± 0.18	50.32 ± 1.49
Blank 4	12:12	10	210.00 ± 20.34	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD
Blank 5	12:12	20	387.67 ± 34.87	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD
Sample 6	18:6	10	341.67 ± 3.61	3.42 ± 1.05	0.90 ± 0.19	0.71 ± 0.03	94.96 ± 1.20
Sample 7	18:6	20	435.42 ± 23.66	2.90 ± 0.78	0.58 ± 0.30	0.33 ± 0.05	96.19 ± 0.76
Control 8	18:6	0	<LOD	<LOD	15.07 ± 2.69	7.28 ± 2.25	77.65 ± 1.24
Blank 9	18:6	10	339.00 ± 5.60	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD
Blank 10	18:6	20	440.65 ± 17.56	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD	<LOD

n = 3; p > 0.05; LOD = limit of detection.