Skip to Main Content
Table 3

Details of optimal location sensors with a certain number of sensors in the scenarios 1–3

Number of sensorsS1
S2
S3
Critical time of pollution entranceDamage changes due to increase in number of sensors (%)Optimal placement of sensorsCritical time of pollution entranceDamage changes due to increase in number of sensors (%)Optimal placement of sensorsCritical time of pollution entranceDamage changes due to increase in number of sensors (%)Optimal placement of sensors
10 – – 16 – – 16 – – 
−53 {19} 12 −67 {45} 16 −50 {44} 
17 −61 {19,61} 18 −72 {9,43} 18 −74 {25,59} 
15 −74 {3,24,43} 18 −82 {23,45,62} 17 −76 {13,27,59} 
17 −75 {19,31,48,61} 16 −82 {6,44,52,61} 16 −82 {4,31,41,48} 
16 −76 {3,25,45,48,49} 16 −83 {6,44,52,61,75} 10 −83 {13,31,41,54,67} 
17 −80 {3,24,36,43,45,68} 18 −86 {4,6,45,52,58,75} 18 −87 {3,25,44,49,55,63} 
Number of sensorsS1
S2
S3
Critical time of pollution entranceDamage changes due to increase in number of sensors (%)Optimal placement of sensorsCritical time of pollution entranceDamage changes due to increase in number of sensors (%)Optimal placement of sensorsCritical time of pollution entranceDamage changes due to increase in number of sensors (%)Optimal placement of sensors
10 – – 16 – – 16 – – 
−53 {19} 12 −67 {45} 16 −50 {44} 
17 −61 {19,61} 18 −72 {9,43} 18 −74 {25,59} 
15 −74 {3,24,43} 18 −82 {23,45,62} 17 −76 {13,27,59} 
17 −75 {19,31,48,61} 16 −82 {6,44,52,61} 16 −82 {4,31,41,48} 
16 −76 {3,25,45,48,49} 16 −83 {6,44,52,61,75} 10 −83 {13,31,41,54,67} 
17 −80 {3,24,36,43,45,68} 18 −86 {4,6,45,52,58,75} 18 −87 {3,25,44,49,55,63} 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal