Skip to Main Content
Table 4

Details of optimal location sensors with a certain number of sensors in the scenarios 4–6

Number of sensorsS4
S5
S6
Critical time of pollution entranceDamage changes due to increase in number of sensors (%)Optimal placement of sensorsCritical time of pollution entranceDamage changes due to increase in number of sensors (%)Optimal placement of sensorsCritical time of pollution entranceDamage changes due to increase in number of sensors (%)Optimal placement of sensors
10 – – 16 – – 16 – – 
−61 {4} 12 −55 {3} 13 −54 {46} 
18 −77 {4,43} 16 −81 {3,43} 16 −82 {4,43} 
15 −85 {3,27,43} 18 −87 {3,27,43} 18 −87 {3,48,52} 
17 −87 {3,27,40,48} 19 −91 {3,27,44,48} 19 −91 {3,32,40,48} 
16 −88 {3,27,43,45,60} 19 −91 {3,27,40,48,60} 19 −92 {3,40,43,49,60} 
17 −93 {1,3,40,43,49,60} 18 −95 {1,2,40,43,49,60} 18 −95 {1,3,40,43,49,60} 
Number of sensorsS4
S5
S6
Critical time of pollution entranceDamage changes due to increase in number of sensors (%)Optimal placement of sensorsCritical time of pollution entranceDamage changes due to increase in number of sensors (%)Optimal placement of sensorsCritical time of pollution entranceDamage changes due to increase in number of sensors (%)Optimal placement of sensors
10 – – 16 – – 16 – – 
−61 {4} 12 −55 {3} 13 −54 {46} 
18 −77 {4,43} 16 −81 {3,43} 16 −82 {4,43} 
15 −85 {3,27,43} 18 −87 {3,27,43} 18 −87 {3,48,52} 
17 −87 {3,27,40,48} 19 −91 {3,27,44,48} 19 −91 {3,32,40,48} 
16 −88 {3,27,43,45,60} 19 −91 {3,27,40,48,60} 19 −92 {3,40,43,49,60} 
17 −93 {1,3,40,43,49,60} 18 −95 {1,2,40,43,49,60} 18 −95 {1,3,40,43,49,60} 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal