Performances evaluation criteria of the five models in Hun river
Models . | Training . | Verification . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSE (%) . | R2 (%) . | RE (%) . | NSE (%) . | R2 (%) . | RE (%) . | |
SWAT | 84.55 | 85.96 | 3.74 | 79.43 | 80.87 | − 4.79 |
XAJ | 78.56 | 78.56 | 0.62 | 73.63 | 75.82 | 3.38 |
MLR | 54.53 | 54.56 | − 3.08 | 34.98 | 36.31 | − 0.44 |
BP | 85.47 | 85.48 | 0.30 | 68.93 | 69.26 | 6.42 |
LSTM | 98.21 | 98.31 | 1.62 | 74.76 | 75.14 | − 4.06 |
Models . | Training . | Verification . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSE (%) . | R2 (%) . | RE (%) . | NSE (%) . | R2 (%) . | RE (%) . | |
SWAT | 84.55 | 85.96 | 3.74 | 79.43 | 80.87 | − 4.79 |
XAJ | 78.56 | 78.56 | 0.62 | 73.63 | 75.82 | 3.38 |
MLR | 54.53 | 54.56 | − 3.08 | 34.98 | 36.31 | − 0.44 |
BP | 85.47 | 85.48 | 0.30 | 68.93 | 69.26 | 6.42 |
LSTM | 98.21 | 98.31 | 1.62 | 74.76 | 75.14 | − 4.06 |