Table 1

A summary of reported studies on modeling hydraulic jump characteristics using experimental and numerical studies

ApproachAuthor(s)/yearParameterObjective of the studyConclusion remarks
Experimental Silvester (1964)  Lj Estimating the hydraulic jump length (Lj) of horizontal channels A semi-empirical solution was provided for the jump length 
Experimental Hughes & Flack (1984)  Lj, h2 Investigating properties of the hydraulic jump over rough beds It was concluded that bed roughness diminishes both the length and the depth of a hydraulic jump 
Experimental Hager et al. (1990)  Lr Defining the length roller in the classical hydraulic jump (LrRelations for design were proposed based on experiments conducted in three different channels 
Experimental Mohamed Ali (1991)  Lj Analyzing the influence of stilling basins on the length of the jump Providing a general formula for the length of jump on a rough bed 
Numerical Ma et al. (2001)  Lj, h2, Lr Using kε turbulence model for numerical investigation of the characteristics of submerged hydraulic jumps Providing information regarding the turbulent structure of the hydraulic jump 
Experimental Pagliara et al. (2008)  h2 Investigation of the parameters that influence the sequent flow depths and modeling the length of the hydraulic jump The experimental data were analyzed to extract a formulation of the correction coefficient based in the bed roughness 
Experimental Abbaspour et al. (2009)  Lj, h2 Studying the hydraulic jump properties effected on corrugated beds The results indicated that the length of the jump and the downstream flow depth on corrugated beds are smaller compared to the jumps on smooth bed 
Experimental Pagliara & Palermo (2015)  Lj, h2 Studying the hydraulic jump characteristics in rough adverse-sloped channels A semi-theoretical predictive relationship was proposed to estimate jump characteristics for a wide range of hydraulic and geometric conditions covering both rough and smooth beds 
Numerical Bayon et al. (2016)  Lr, h2 Challenging the capability of two numerical models for simulating the hydraulic jump Both numerical models gave promising results compared to the experimental observations 
Experimental Pourabdollah et al. (2019)  h2 Experimental investigation of hydraulic jump characteristics on various beds, slopes, and step heights In addition to presenting the observed values, two analytical solutions were also developed based on the momentum equation 
Numerical Gu et al. (2019)  Lj, h2 Using the SPH (smoothed particle hydrodynamics) meshless method to simulate the hydraulic jump on corrugated beds Numerical simulations were accurate in modeling different hydraulic aspects of the hydraulic jumps 
ApproachAuthor(s)/yearParameterObjective of the studyConclusion remarks
Experimental Silvester (1964)  Lj Estimating the hydraulic jump length (Lj) of horizontal channels A semi-empirical solution was provided for the jump length 
Experimental Hughes & Flack (1984)  Lj, h2 Investigating properties of the hydraulic jump over rough beds It was concluded that bed roughness diminishes both the length and the depth of a hydraulic jump 
Experimental Hager et al. (1990)  Lr Defining the length roller in the classical hydraulic jump (LrRelations for design were proposed based on experiments conducted in three different channels 
Experimental Mohamed Ali (1991)  Lj Analyzing the influence of stilling basins on the length of the jump Providing a general formula for the length of jump on a rough bed 
Numerical Ma et al. (2001)  Lj, h2, Lr Using kε turbulence model for numerical investigation of the characteristics of submerged hydraulic jumps Providing information regarding the turbulent structure of the hydraulic jump 
Experimental Pagliara et al. (2008)  h2 Investigation of the parameters that influence the sequent flow depths and modeling the length of the hydraulic jump The experimental data were analyzed to extract a formulation of the correction coefficient based in the bed roughness 
Experimental Abbaspour et al. (2009)  Lj, h2 Studying the hydraulic jump properties effected on corrugated beds The results indicated that the length of the jump and the downstream flow depth on corrugated beds are smaller compared to the jumps on smooth bed 
Experimental Pagliara & Palermo (2015)  Lj, h2 Studying the hydraulic jump characteristics in rough adverse-sloped channels A semi-theoretical predictive relationship was proposed to estimate jump characteristics for a wide range of hydraulic and geometric conditions covering both rough and smooth beds 
Numerical Bayon et al. (2016)  Lr, h2 Challenging the capability of two numerical models for simulating the hydraulic jump Both numerical models gave promising results compared to the experimental observations 
Experimental Pourabdollah et al. (2019)  h2 Experimental investigation of hydraulic jump characteristics on various beds, slopes, and step heights In addition to presenting the observed values, two analytical solutions were also developed based on the momentum equation 
Numerical Gu et al. (2019)  Lj, h2 Using the SPH (smoothed particle hydrodynamics) meshless method to simulate the hydraulic jump on corrugated beds Numerical simulations were accurate in modeling different hydraulic aspects of the hydraulic jumps 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal