Statistical tables of corrective effects for each study basin
Basin . | Flood events . | SSC model . | DSRC method . | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Qualified rate (%) . | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Qualified rate (%) . | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Jiuyuangou | 11 | 0.500 | 23.36 | 49.69 | 63.6 | 0 | 0.849 | 13.48 | 8.70 | 100 | 4 | 9 | 11 |
Chabagou | 45 | 0.442 | 23.74 | 56.87 | 84.4 | 0 | 0.929 | 11.56 | 9.99 | 97.8 | 42 | 43 | 39 |
Dali River | 45 | 0.301 | 34.73 | 33.46 | 55.6 | 0 | 0.816 | 19.01 | –19.99 | 95.6 | 7 | 36 | 23 |
Basin . | Flood events . | SSC model . | DSRC method . | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Qualified rate (%) . | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Qualified rate (%) . | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Jiuyuangou | 11 | 0.500 | 23.36 | 49.69 | 63.6 | 0 | 0.849 | 13.48 | 8.70 | 100 | 4 | 9 | 11 |
Chabagou | 45 | 0.442 | 23.74 | 56.87 | 84.4 | 0 | 0.929 | 11.56 | 9.99 | 97.8 | 42 | 43 | 39 |
Dali River | 45 | 0.301 | 34.73 | 33.46 | 55.6 | 0 | 0.816 | 19.01 | –19.99 | 95.6 | 7 | 36 | 23 |