Skip to Main Content
Table 5

The results of calibration and verification of different flood hydrographs

DateThe observed peak discharge of flood hydrograph (CMS)The calculated peak discharge of flood hydrograph (CMS)Percentage of difference between obs. and cal. (%)The observed volume of stream flow (m3)The calculated volume of stream flow (m3)Percentage of difference between obs. and cal. (%)
2007/12/13 16.1 16.6 3.11 477,900 510,000 6.72 
2008/1/3 25.5 24.5 −3.92 812,400 847,800 4.36 
2009/3/18 67.4 67.2 −0.3 1,248,500 1,211,500 −2.96 
2010/1/5 30.2 28.2 −6.62 555,100 621,700 12 
2011/3/12 33.2 31.3 −5.72 699,800 708,900 1.3 
2007/1/24 77.5 78.8 1.68 1,726,800 1,836,700 6.36 
2011/4/23 26.3 26.9 2.28 1,034,600 1,024,900 −0.94 
DateThe observed peak discharge of flood hydrograph (CMS)The calculated peak discharge of flood hydrograph (CMS)Percentage of difference between obs. and cal. (%)The observed volume of stream flow (m3)The calculated volume of stream flow (m3)Percentage of difference between obs. and cal. (%)
2007/12/13 16.1 16.6 3.11 477,900 510,000 6.72 
2008/1/3 25.5 24.5 −3.92 812,400 847,800 4.36 
2009/3/18 67.4 67.2 −0.3 1,248,500 1,211,500 −2.96 
2010/1/5 30.2 28.2 −6.62 555,100 621,700 12 
2011/3/12 33.2 31.3 −5.72 699,800 708,900 1.3 
2007/1/24 77.5 78.8 1.68 1,726,800 1,836,700 6.36 
2011/4/23 26.3 26.9 2.28 1,034,600 1,024,900 −0.94 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal