Skip to Main Content
Table 4

Comparison of results obtained from proposed GA with other optimization and heuristic algorithms for five sensor solutions (Rathi & Gupta 2017b)

Methodology (1)Sensor location (nodes) (2)Z1 (min) (3)Z2 (People) (4)Z3 (gallons) (5)Z4 (DL) (%) (6)Z5 (DC) (%) (7)
Berry et al. (2006)  17,21,68,79,122 542 140 2,459 0.609 25.23 
Dorini et al. (2006)  10,31,45,83,118 1,068 258 7,983 0.801 (1) 30.37 
Eliades & Polycarpou (2006)  17,31,45,83,126 912 221 7,862 0.763 (3) 34.39 
Ghimire & Barkdoll (2006a)  126,30,118,102,24 432 357 4,287 0.367 68.06 
Ghimire & Barkdoll (2006b)  126,30,102,118,58 424 331 3,995 0.402 71.40 
Guan et al. (2006)  17,31,81,98,102 642 159 2,811 0.663 22.88 
Gueli (2006)  112,118,109,100,84 794 403 10,309 0.699 31.00 
Huang et al. (2006)  68,81,82,97,118 541 280 4,465 0.676 33.44 
Krause et al. (2006)  17,83,122,31,45 842 181 3,992 0.756 (4) 24.02 
Ostfeld & Salomons (2006)  117,71,98,68,82 461 250 4,499 0.622 22.76 
Preis and Ostfeld (2006)  68,101,116,22,46 439 151 7,109 0.477 12.63 
Propato & Piller (2006)  17,22,68,83,123 711 164 3,148 0.725 (5) 27.45 
Trachtman (2006)  1,29,102,30,20 391 142 2,504 0.237 26.41 
Wu & Walski (2006)  45,68,83,100,118 704 303 8,406 0.787 (2) 37.34 
Chang et al. (2011)  47,68,76,97,118 479 209 2,824 0.575 31.83 
Rathi & Gupta (2015) (SGA1) 58, 83,101,118,124 724 297 4,510 0.725 (5) 43.85 
Methodology (1)Sensor location (nodes) (2)Z1 (min) (3)Z2 (People) (4)Z3 (gallons) (5)Z4 (DL) (%) (6)Z5 (DC) (%) (7)
Berry et al. (2006)  17,21,68,79,122 542 140 2,459 0.609 25.23 
Dorini et al. (2006)  10,31,45,83,118 1,068 258 7,983 0.801 (1) 30.37 
Eliades & Polycarpou (2006)  17,31,45,83,126 912 221 7,862 0.763 (3) 34.39 
Ghimire & Barkdoll (2006a)  126,30,118,102,24 432 357 4,287 0.367 68.06 
Ghimire & Barkdoll (2006b)  126,30,102,118,58 424 331 3,995 0.402 71.40 
Guan et al. (2006)  17,31,81,98,102 642 159 2,811 0.663 22.88 
Gueli (2006)  112,118,109,100,84 794 403 10,309 0.699 31.00 
Huang et al. (2006)  68,81,82,97,118 541 280 4,465 0.676 33.44 
Krause et al. (2006)  17,83,122,31,45 842 181 3,992 0.756 (4) 24.02 
Ostfeld & Salomons (2006)  117,71,98,68,82 461 250 4,499 0.622 22.76 
Preis and Ostfeld (2006)  68,101,116,22,46 439 151 7,109 0.477 12.63 
Propato & Piller (2006)  17,22,68,83,123 711 164 3,148 0.725 (5) 27.45 
Trachtman (2006)  1,29,102,30,20 391 142 2,504 0.237 26.41 
Wu & Walski (2006)  45,68,83,100,118 704 303 8,406 0.787 (2) 37.34 
Chang et al. (2011)  47,68,76,97,118 479 209 2,824 0.575 31.83 
Rathi & Gupta (2015) (SGA1) 58, 83,101,118,124 724 297 4,510 0.725 (5) 43.85 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal