Skip to Main Content
Table 8

Comparison of MSA, HS and ICA for optimization of multi-reservoir systems

Case studyAlgorithmPerformance metrics
R2RMSEMAEdMSENMSEMAPE
Four-reservoir system MSA 0.9511 0.5275 0.1951 0.9874 0.3506 0.04993 490.1845 
HS 0.5475 1.7826 1.3346 0.8442 3.1776 0.4525 9,489.9 
ICA 0.8108 1.1838 0.5288 0.9493 1.4015 0.1996 6,259.4729 
10-reservoir system MSA 0.9852 0.5211 0.1357 0.9963 0.4254 0.0150 282.0782 
HS 0.4151 4.1406 2.7930 0.7933 17.1447 0.6043 17,878 
ICA 0.6824 3.0784 1.9390 0.9087 9.4765 0.334 12,073 
Case studyAlgorithmPerformance metrics
R2RMSEMAEdMSENMSEMAPE
Four-reservoir system MSA 0.9511 0.5275 0.1951 0.9874 0.3506 0.04993 490.1845 
HS 0.5475 1.7826 1.3346 0.8442 3.1776 0.4525 9,489.9 
ICA 0.8108 1.1838 0.5288 0.9493 1.4015 0.1996 6,259.4729 
10-reservoir system MSA 0.9852 0.5211 0.1357 0.9963 0.4254 0.0150 282.0782 
HS 0.4151 4.1406 2.7930 0.7933 17.1447 0.6043 17,878 
ICA 0.6824 3.0784 1.9390 0.9087 9.4765 0.334 12,073 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal