Skip to Main Content
Table 9

Comparison of results obtained for the four- and 10-reservoir problems

StudyAlgorithmAverage value of the objective functions
Four-reservoir system10-reservoir system
Wardlaw & Sharif (1999)  GA – 1,190.25 
Bozorg-Haddad et al. (2011, 2016) HBMO 307.50 1,148.05 
GSA 308.30 – 
Ahmadianfar et al. (2016)  IBA 308.05 1,192.89 
Garousi-Nejad et al. (2016)  FA 305.51 1,097.41 
MFA 308.21 1,183.59 
Ehteram et al. (2017)  Krill 307.26 1,189.66 
Hybrid GA-krill 308.17 1,193.91 
Qaderi et al. (2018)  WCA 306.39 1,172.42 
Present study HS 264.61 1,060.76 
ICA 306.47 1,136.22 
MSA 308.83 1,195.58 
StudyAlgorithmAverage value of the objective functions
Four-reservoir system10-reservoir system
Wardlaw & Sharif (1999)  GA – 1,190.25 
Bozorg-Haddad et al. (2011, 2016) HBMO 307.50 1,148.05 
GSA 308.30 – 
Ahmadianfar et al. (2016)  IBA 308.05 1,192.89 
Garousi-Nejad et al. (2016)  FA 305.51 1,097.41 
MFA 308.21 1,183.59 
Ehteram et al. (2017)  Krill 307.26 1,189.66 
Hybrid GA-krill 308.17 1,193.91 
Qaderi et al. (2018)  WCA 306.39 1,172.42 
Present study HS 264.61 1,060.76 
ICA 306.47 1,136.22 
MSA 308.83 1,195.58 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal