Skip to Main Content
Table 3

Comparison of P adsorption capacity of different La-based adsorbents*

AdsorbentsLa/%Adsorption capacity (mg P/g)References
La(OH)3-modified EV 3.0–7.0 41..5 79.6 Huang et al. (2014a)  
C-La(OH)3 2.5–9.0 71.0 55.6 Xie et al. (2014b)  
C-La2O3 <∼ 10.5 85.3 47.0 Xie et al. (2015)  
M-La(OH)3 2.5–12.0 58.0 107.5 Xie et al. (2014b)  
MCH-La(OH)3-EW 4.5–11 42.9 90.2 Dong et al. (2017)  
La-doped SiO2 3.0–8.0 22.4 47.9 Huang et al. (2014b)  
La metal-organic frameworks NA NA 173.8 Zhang et al. (2017)  
Magnetite/La(OH)3 7.0 34.9 52.7 Fang et al. (2018)  
LC 3.0–11.0 46.0 112.9 This work 
AdsorbentsLa/%Adsorption capacity (mg P/g)References
La(OH)3-modified EV 3.0–7.0 41..5 79.6 Huang et al. (2014a)  
C-La(OH)3 2.5–9.0 71.0 55.6 Xie et al. (2014b)  
C-La2O3 <∼ 10.5 85.3 47.0 Xie et al. (2015)  
M-La(OH)3 2.5–12.0 58.0 107.5 Xie et al. (2014b)  
MCH-La(OH)3-EW 4.5–11 42.9 90.2 Dong et al. (2017)  
La-doped SiO2 3.0–8.0 22.4 47.9 Huang et al. (2014b)  
La metal-organic frameworks NA NA 173.8 Zhang et al. (2017)  
Magnetite/La(OH)3 7.0 34.9 52.7 Fang et al. (2018)  
LC 3.0–11.0 46.0 112.9 This work 

NA = Not available.

*Values from the literature are provided for comparison.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal