Skip to Main Content
Table 4

Comparison between graphene oxide electro-activated sulfate-based radicals and other carbon-based materials

ProcessPollutantPollutant concentration (mg/L)Sulfate source concentration (mg/L)Time (min)Kapp (1/min)Removal efficiencyReference
Electro-activated persulfate by graphene oxide Acid blue 25 300 500 PMS 40 0.0592 54% TOC Current study 
Electro-activated carbon fiber peroxydisulfate Carbamazepine 0.042 mM 100 mM PDS 120 0.0727 57% TOC Liu et al. (2018a, 2018b) 
Electro-activated graphite peroxydisulfate Sulfamethoxazole – 1000 mg/L PDS 0.9944 95% Song et al. (2018)  
Electro-activated graphite peroxydisulfate Nitrobenzene – 1000 mg/L PDS 30 0.0313 60% Song et al. (2018)  
Electro-activated graphite peroxydisulfate Atrazine – 1000 mg/L PDS 30 0.0415 75% Song et al. (2018)  
Electro-activated MWCNT peroxydisulfate Sulfamethoxazole – 1000 mg/L PDS 0.4568 80% Song et al. (2018)  
ProcessPollutantPollutant concentration (mg/L)Sulfate source concentration (mg/L)Time (min)Kapp (1/min)Removal efficiencyReference
Electro-activated persulfate by graphene oxide Acid blue 25 300 500 PMS 40 0.0592 54% TOC Current study 
Electro-activated carbon fiber peroxydisulfate Carbamazepine 0.042 mM 100 mM PDS 120 0.0727 57% TOC Liu et al. (2018a, 2018b) 
Electro-activated graphite peroxydisulfate Sulfamethoxazole – 1000 mg/L PDS 0.9944 95% Song et al. (2018)  
Electro-activated graphite peroxydisulfate Nitrobenzene – 1000 mg/L PDS 30 0.0313 60% Song et al. (2018)  
Electro-activated graphite peroxydisulfate Atrazine – 1000 mg/L PDS 30 0.0415 75% Song et al. (2018)  
Electro-activated MWCNT peroxydisulfate Sulfamethoxazole – 1000 mg/L PDS 0.4568 80% Song et al. (2018)  
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal