Skip to Main Content
Table 12

Comparison of absorption capacities of different adsorbents with the present studied adsorbents

AdsorbentNitrate (mg/g)Phosphate (mg/g)References
Solid waste residue (SWR) from aluminium sulphate factory 0.065 13.15 Berkessa et al. (2019)  
Clinoptilolite-Supported Iron Hydroxide Nanoparticle 10.1 9.71 Mikhak et al. (2017)  
Amine crosslinked magnetic banana bract activated carbon 75.81 91.78 Karthikeyan et al. (2020)  
Modified commercial activated carbon 21.51 – Mazarji et al. (2017)  
Fish scales and neem leaves as novel adsorbent 24.06 23.98 This study 
AdsorbentNitrate (mg/g)Phosphate (mg/g)References
Solid waste residue (SWR) from aluminium sulphate factory 0.065 13.15 Berkessa et al. (2019)  
Clinoptilolite-Supported Iron Hydroxide Nanoparticle 10.1 9.71 Mikhak et al. (2017)  
Amine crosslinked magnetic banana bract activated carbon 75.81 91.78 Karthikeyan et al. (2020)  
Modified commercial activated carbon 21.51 – Mazarji et al. (2017)  
Fish scales and neem leaves as novel adsorbent 24.06 23.98 This study 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal