Table 3

Monitoring and control in place and prioritisation

Round 1
Round 2
Mechanisms in placeUsefulLevel of agreement5 most usefulLevel of agreement
Number of respondents (n=14 15 12 
Inspection of the trucks and vehicles used 10 >50% >50% 
Customer satisfaction surveys or follow-up call 11 >50% >50% 
Inspection of the emptying equipment and tools used >50% >50% 
Inspection made on arrival to disposal site 12 >75% >50% 
Self-reporting by emptiers on key quality indicators (safety incidents reports, operating protocol checklist, etc.) >50% >50% 
Self-reporting by emptiers on key service indicators (number of customers served, amount of sludge emptied or delivered to disposal, emptying fee collected, etc.) >50% >50% 
Audits or inspection of the paperwork of the company >50% >25% 
Site inspections during emptying operations >50% >25% 
No monitoring and control mechanism in place 0% NA NA 
GPS monitoring of the trucks N/A Added by respondent >50% 
Round 1
Round 2
Mechanisms in placeUsefulLevel of agreement5 most usefulLevel of agreement
Number of respondents (n=14 15 12 
Inspection of the trucks and vehicles used 10 >50% >50% 
Customer satisfaction surveys or follow-up call 11 >50% >50% 
Inspection of the emptying equipment and tools used >50% >50% 
Inspection made on arrival to disposal site 12 >75% >50% 
Self-reporting by emptiers on key quality indicators (safety incidents reports, operating protocol checklist, etc.) >50% >50% 
Self-reporting by emptiers on key service indicators (number of customers served, amount of sludge emptied or delivered to disposal, emptying fee collected, etc.) >50% >50% 
Audits or inspection of the paperwork of the company >50% >25% 
Site inspections during emptying operations >50% >25% 
No monitoring and control mechanism in place 0% NA NA 
GPS monitoring of the trucks N/A Added by respondent >50% 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal