Pro-poor measures in place and prioritisation
| . | Round 1 . | Round 2 . | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Measures in place . | Useful . | Level of agreement . | 5 most useful . | Level of agreement . |
| Number of respondents (n= ) | 15 | 11 | 12 | ||
| Subsidies to build or upgrade toilets so that they are easy to empty | 3 | 6 | >50% | 11 | >75% |
| Subsidies or contracts given to the emptiers to empty poor households’ pits or tanks | 4 | 7 | >50% | 10 | >75% |
| Transfer stations available in the poorest areas | 3 | 6 | >50% | 7 | >50% |
| Formalisation of informal emptiers operating in the poorest areas | 1 | 6 | >50% | 6 | >50% |
| Subsidies or micro-finance loans given directly to the households to pay for emptying their pit or tank | 2 | 6 | >50% | 4 | >25% |
| Public operators offering emptying services at a reduced rate or for free | 3 | 2 | < 25% | 2 | < 25% |
| No pro-poor measure in place | 10 | 0 | 0% | NA | NA |
| Toll-free calls to emptying services providers | N/A | Added by respondent | 6 | >50% | |
| Annual emptying operation in the poorest areas with a reduced fee by private operators | N/A | Added by respondent | 4 | >25% | |
| Cross subsidies for the poor via tariffs (different prices charged to customers based on their income) | N/A | Added by respondent | 3 | >25% | |
| No fee to discharge pit latrine sludge at a transfer or treatment station | N/A | Added by respondent | 3 | >25% | |
| Free emptying equipment and/or transport to emptiers working in poor areas | N/A | Added by respondent | 3 | >25% | |
| . | Round 1 . | Round 2 . | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Measures in place . | Useful . | Level of agreement . | 5 most useful . | Level of agreement . |
| Number of respondents (n= ) | 15 | 11 | 12 | ||
| Subsidies to build or upgrade toilets so that they are easy to empty | 3 | 6 | >50% | 11 | >75% |
| Subsidies or contracts given to the emptiers to empty poor households’ pits or tanks | 4 | 7 | >50% | 10 | >75% |
| Transfer stations available in the poorest areas | 3 | 6 | >50% | 7 | >50% |
| Formalisation of informal emptiers operating in the poorest areas | 1 | 6 | >50% | 6 | >50% |
| Subsidies or micro-finance loans given directly to the households to pay for emptying their pit or tank | 2 | 6 | >50% | 4 | >25% |
| Public operators offering emptying services at a reduced rate or for free | 3 | 2 | < 25% | 2 | < 25% |
| No pro-poor measure in place | 10 | 0 | 0% | NA | NA |
| Toll-free calls to emptying services providers | N/A | Added by respondent | 6 | >50% | |
| Annual emptying operation in the poorest areas with a reduced fee by private operators | N/A | Added by respondent | 4 | >25% | |
| Cross subsidies for the poor via tariffs (different prices charged to customers based on their income) | N/A | Added by respondent | 3 | >25% | |
| No fee to discharge pit latrine sludge at a transfer or treatment station | N/A | Added by respondent | 3 | >25% | |
| Free emptying equipment and/or transport to emptiers working in poor areas | N/A | Added by respondent | 3 | >25% | |