Skip to Main Content
Table 5

Water softening performance comparison of this work with other papers

Hardness (mg/L as CaCO3)Current density (A/m2)Softening rate (g/m2 h−1)Reference
250 20 2.6 Hasson et al. (2008)  
240 ∼20 3.4–6.9 Gabrielli et al. (2006)  
350 20 8–15.09 Yu et al. (2018)  
1,180 108 22.8 Hasson et al. (2008)  
300 100 10 Zhi & Zhang (2014)  
350 100 25.5–34.3 YU et al. (2018)  
350 18.3 29.16 Luan et al. (2019)  
870 30.6 42.32 Luan et al. (2019)  
6,540 250 530–570 Zaslavschi et al. (2013)  
1,600 100 460 Zaslavschi et al. (2013)  
1,150 30 19.95 Zhang et al. (2020b)  
800 10 ∼ 60 188.5–604.5 This work-HF 
800 10 ∼ 70 195–558.6 This work-DC 
Hardness (mg/L as CaCO3)Current density (A/m2)Softening rate (g/m2 h−1)Reference
250 20 2.6 Hasson et al. (2008)  
240 ∼20 3.4–6.9 Gabrielli et al. (2006)  
350 20 8–15.09 Yu et al. (2018)  
1,180 108 22.8 Hasson et al. (2008)  
300 100 10 Zhi & Zhang (2014)  
350 100 25.5–34.3 YU et al. (2018)  
350 18.3 29.16 Luan et al. (2019)  
870 30.6 42.32 Luan et al. (2019)  
6,540 250 530–570 Zaslavschi et al. (2013)  
1,600 100 460 Zaslavschi et al. (2013)  
1,150 30 19.95 Zhang et al. (2020b)  
800 10 ∼ 60 188.5–604.5 This work-HF 
800 10 ∼ 70 195–558.6 This work-DC 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal