Skip to Main Content
Table 6

Comparison the efficiency of various adsorbents for CBZ removal

AdsorbentQ (mg.g−1)Contact time (min)References
Carbon dot-modified magnetic carbon nanotubes 65 180 Deng et al. (2019)  
UiO-66 derived zirconia/porous carbon nanocomposites 190 60 Chen et al. (2020)  
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes 224.6 120 Ncibi & Sillanpää (2017)  
Synthesized magnetic activated carbon 182.9 – Baghdadi et al. (2016)  
Bentonite clay 2.35 15 Özçelik et al.(2020)  
UiO-66 and UiO-66/graphene nanoplatelet composite 51.17 – ElHussein et al. (2020)  
Iron oxide modified diatomaceous earth 0.44 180 Jemutai-Kimosop et al. (2020)  
Magnetic black carbon 31.8 <10 Cai & Larese-Casanova (2020)  
Magnetic CoFe2O4/rGO nanocomposites 50.5 10 Jiang et al. (2018)  
Reduced graphene oxide-nano zero valent iron (Fe0-rGO) composite 50 40 This study 
AdsorbentQ (mg.g−1)Contact time (min)References
Carbon dot-modified magnetic carbon nanotubes 65 180 Deng et al. (2019)  
UiO-66 derived zirconia/porous carbon nanocomposites 190 60 Chen et al. (2020)  
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes 224.6 120 Ncibi & Sillanpää (2017)  
Synthesized magnetic activated carbon 182.9 – Baghdadi et al. (2016)  
Bentonite clay 2.35 15 Özçelik et al.(2020)  
UiO-66 and UiO-66/graphene nanoplatelet composite 51.17 – ElHussein et al. (2020)  
Iron oxide modified diatomaceous earth 0.44 180 Jemutai-Kimosop et al. (2020)  
Magnetic black carbon 31.8 <10 Cai & Larese-Casanova (2020)  
Magnetic CoFe2O4/rGO nanocomposites 50.5 10 Jiang et al. (2018)  
Reduced graphene oxide-nano zero valent iron (Fe0-rGO) composite 50 40 This study 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal