Summary of recent and emerging treatment technologies for PFAS degradation/removal
Treatment technology . | Target PFAS . | Water matrix . | Initial concentration . | Degradation/sorption . | Scale . | Reference . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recent technologies | AC | PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFHxA, | Municipal WWTP effluent | 3.7–16 ng/L | PFOS and short-chain PFAS not removed | Full scale | Thompson et al. (2011) |
PAC | PFOA, PFOS | Municipal WWTP effluent | 25–44 ng/L | 6–52% for PFOS, PFOA not removed | Full scale | Mailler et al. (2015) | |
GAC | PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFDA, PFHpA, PFHxA, PFHxS, PFPnA, PFBA | Municipal WWTP effluent | 1 μg/L | Complete removal except PFOS (40%) | Pilot scale | Inyang & Dickenson (2017) | |
AC | PFOA, PFHxA, PFHpA | Industrial WWTP effluent | 0.1–0,29 mmol/L | 88–90% | Laboratory scale | Du et al. (2015) | |
GAC | 13 PFAS | Municipal WWTP effluent | 2 μg/L | 95% on average | Laboratory scale | Rostvall et al. (2018) | |
GAC (Calgon Filtrasorb® 300 | PFAAs | DI water + NOM | 1 μg/L | >20% breakthrough for all PFAAs and negative removal for PFBA and PFPeA | Laboratory scale | Appleman et al. (2013) | |
Ion exchange (PFA 300) | PFOS | DI water | 0.01–1 mg/L | 99%, 455 mg/g adsorption capacity | Laboratory scale | Chularueangaksorn et al. (2013) | |
Ion exchange (IRA67) | PFOS | Simulated industrial WW | 400 mg/L | 4–5 mmol/g adsorption capacity | Laboratory scale | Deng et al. (2010) | |
Ion exchange (A714) | PFOA, PFOS | Simulated industrial WW | 1,000–3,000 mg/L | PFOS below detection limit, 99.6% PFOA removal | Laboratory scale | Lampert et al. (2007) | |
Ion exchange | 11 short-chain, 5 long-chain including PFBA, PFBS, GenX | Surface water | 1 μg/L | 80–100% | Laboratory scale | Ateia et al. (2018) | |
Ion exchange (IRA67) | PFOA, PFOS, PFBA, PFBS, PFHxA, PFHxS | Simulated AFFF-impacted groundwater | 0.1–0.5 mmol/L | 90% of PFOS, 10% of PFBA (PFOS > PFHxS > PFOA > PFBS > PFHxA > PFBA) | Laboratory scale | Maimaiti et al. (2018) | |
Emerging technologies | EOX (BDD) | PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFOA, FTSAs, 6:2 FTCA, 6:2 FTAB | Industrial WWTP effluent | ΣPFAS = 1,642 μg/L | Σ99.7% | Laboratory scale | Gomez-Ruiz et al. (2017b) |
EOX (Ti/RuO2) | PFOA, PFOS and PFAAs | AFFF-impacted groundwater | 0.7–65 μg/L | 98% for PFOS and 58% for PFOS | Laboratory scale | Schaefer et al. (2015) | |
EOX (BDD) | Short- and long-chain PFCAs | DI water, river water and municipal WWTP effluent | 200 μg/L each | >92 and 75% defluorination for long-chain PFCAs in DI water and effluent | Laboratory scale | Barisci & Suri (2020) | |
EOX (TiRuO2) | PFCAs and PFSAs | DI water | 100 μg/L each | 16–67% for short-chain PFAS, 64–91% for long-chain PFAS. | Laboratory scale | Barisci & Suri (2021) | |
EOX (magnéli phase) | PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFHpA, PFHpS | Still bottom wastewater | Not mentioned | 56.9%–98.9% | Laboratory scale | Wang et al. (2020a) | |
EOX (Lead) | C6–C8 PFAS | Industrial WWTP effluent | 1,000–20,000 μg/L | 99%, less effective for short-chain | Pilot scale | Fath et al. (2016) | |
Ultrasound (505 kHz) | PFOA, PFOS, PFHS, PFBS, PFHA | AFFF-contaminated wastewater | 53 ± 13–3,650 ± 710 mg/L | 90% removal in 2 h with 50% TOC removal | Laboratory scale | Vecitis et al. (2010) | |
Ultrasound (354–612 kHz) | PFOA, PFOS | DI water and groundwater below a landfill | ∼100 μg/L | Rate constant reduced by 56–61% in groundwater | Laboratory scale | Cheng et al. (2008) | |
Plasma-based treatment | PFOA, PFOS | DI water | 8.3 mg/L | Complete removal in 120 min | Laboratory scale | Singh et al. (2019) | |
Plasma-based treatment | Five long-chain, six short-chain PFAAs and eight PFAA precursors | Landfill leachate | 102–3,000 ng/L | Both PFOS and PFOA were removed by 90% in 10–75 min. Other long- and short-chain PFAAs were removed by >99% | Laboratory scale | Singh et al. (2020a) | |
Plasma-based treatment | Short- and long-chain PFAAs | Still bottom wastewater | ∼0.01–100 mg/L | >99% of short- and long-chain PFAAs were degraded in 2–6 h | Laboratory scale | Singh et al. (2020b) | |
Emerging technologies | Photocatalysis with needle-like Ga2O3 | PFOA | Municipal wastewater influent | 500 μg/L | 100% PFOA degradation was achieved in 180 min which was much longer compared to ultrapure water | Laboratory scale | Shao et al. (2013b) |
Photocatalysis in the presence of In2O3 catalyst | PFOA | Municipal wastewater effluent | 100 μmol/L | While 69% PFOA was degraded in pure water within 180 min, the efficiency was reduced to only 10% in wastewater, however, with pH adjustment and ozone addition similar PFOA degradation (69%) was achieved | Laboratory scale | Li et al. (2012) | |
Photocatalysis in the presence of In2O3 catalyst | PFOA | Simulated municipal wastewater | 100 mg/L | PFOA degradation was 97.6% with a complete defluorination at pH 2 | Laboratory scale | Jiang et al. (2016) | |
Electro assisted MWNTs | PFOA, PFOS | DI water with ionic strength | 100 μg/L | 92% | Laboratory scale | Li et al. (2011a) | |
Organo-clay (matCARETM) | PFOS | AFFF-contaminated wastewater | 0.6 mmol/L | 0.09 mmol/L adsorption capacity | Laboratory scale | Das et al. (2013) | |
Organo-clay (matCARETM) | PFOA, PFOS | Municipal wastewater influent | 0.04–0.02 mmol/L | Complete removal | Full scale | Arias Espana et al. (2015) | |
Photocatalysis with sheaf-like Ga2O3 | PFOA | Municipal wastewater effluent | 500 μg/L | 81% removal within 3 h with 66% defluorination, 100% after adjusting pH to 4.3 | Laboratory scale | Shao et al. (2013a) | |
COF | PFOA, PFOS, GenX and other PFAS | DI water | 100 μg/L | > 90% | Laboratory scale | Ji et al. (2018) | |
COF | GenX and HFPO-TA | DI water | 0.0756 mmol/L | 100% for HFPO-TA and 80% for GenX | Laboratory scale | Wang et al. (2020c) | |
COF | 16 PFAS including PFBA, PFBS, and GenX | Industrial wastewater effluent | 1,000 ng/L | Fast removal kinetics in 60–120 min with no desorption in 24 h | Laboratory scale | Ateia et al. (2019b) | |
MOF | PFOS | DI water | 1–100 mM | 100% | Laboratory scale | Barpaga et al. (2019) | |
MOF | PFOA and PFOS | DI water | 100–1,000 mg/L | > 90% | Laboratory scale | Sini et al. (2018) |
Treatment technology . | Target PFAS . | Water matrix . | Initial concentration . | Degradation/sorption . | Scale . | Reference . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recent technologies | AC | PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFHxA, | Municipal WWTP effluent | 3.7–16 ng/L | PFOS and short-chain PFAS not removed | Full scale | Thompson et al. (2011) |
PAC | PFOA, PFOS | Municipal WWTP effluent | 25–44 ng/L | 6–52% for PFOS, PFOA not removed | Full scale | Mailler et al. (2015) | |
GAC | PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFDA, PFHpA, PFHxA, PFHxS, PFPnA, PFBA | Municipal WWTP effluent | 1 μg/L | Complete removal except PFOS (40%) | Pilot scale | Inyang & Dickenson (2017) | |
AC | PFOA, PFHxA, PFHpA | Industrial WWTP effluent | 0.1–0,29 mmol/L | 88–90% | Laboratory scale | Du et al. (2015) | |
GAC | 13 PFAS | Municipal WWTP effluent | 2 μg/L | 95% on average | Laboratory scale | Rostvall et al. (2018) | |
GAC (Calgon Filtrasorb® 300 | PFAAs | DI water + NOM | 1 μg/L | >20% breakthrough for all PFAAs and negative removal for PFBA and PFPeA | Laboratory scale | Appleman et al. (2013) | |
Ion exchange (PFA 300) | PFOS | DI water | 0.01–1 mg/L | 99%, 455 mg/g adsorption capacity | Laboratory scale | Chularueangaksorn et al. (2013) | |
Ion exchange (IRA67) | PFOS | Simulated industrial WW | 400 mg/L | 4–5 mmol/g adsorption capacity | Laboratory scale | Deng et al. (2010) | |
Ion exchange (A714) | PFOA, PFOS | Simulated industrial WW | 1,000–3,000 mg/L | PFOS below detection limit, 99.6% PFOA removal | Laboratory scale | Lampert et al. (2007) | |
Ion exchange | 11 short-chain, 5 long-chain including PFBA, PFBS, GenX | Surface water | 1 μg/L | 80–100% | Laboratory scale | Ateia et al. (2018) | |
Ion exchange (IRA67) | PFOA, PFOS, PFBA, PFBS, PFHxA, PFHxS | Simulated AFFF-impacted groundwater | 0.1–0.5 mmol/L | 90% of PFOS, 10% of PFBA (PFOS > PFHxS > PFOA > PFBS > PFHxA > PFBA) | Laboratory scale | Maimaiti et al. (2018) | |
Emerging technologies | EOX (BDD) | PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFOA, FTSAs, 6:2 FTCA, 6:2 FTAB | Industrial WWTP effluent | ΣPFAS = 1,642 μg/L | Σ99.7% | Laboratory scale | Gomez-Ruiz et al. (2017b) |
EOX (Ti/RuO2) | PFOA, PFOS and PFAAs | AFFF-impacted groundwater | 0.7–65 μg/L | 98% for PFOS and 58% for PFOS | Laboratory scale | Schaefer et al. (2015) | |
EOX (BDD) | Short- and long-chain PFCAs | DI water, river water and municipal WWTP effluent | 200 μg/L each | >92 and 75% defluorination for long-chain PFCAs in DI water and effluent | Laboratory scale | Barisci & Suri (2020) | |
EOX (TiRuO2) | PFCAs and PFSAs | DI water | 100 μg/L each | 16–67% for short-chain PFAS, 64–91% for long-chain PFAS. | Laboratory scale | Barisci & Suri (2021) | |
EOX (magnéli phase) | PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFHpA, PFHpS | Still bottom wastewater | Not mentioned | 56.9%–98.9% | Laboratory scale | Wang et al. (2020a) | |
EOX (Lead) | C6–C8 PFAS | Industrial WWTP effluent | 1,000–20,000 μg/L | 99%, less effective for short-chain | Pilot scale | Fath et al. (2016) | |
Ultrasound (505 kHz) | PFOA, PFOS, PFHS, PFBS, PFHA | AFFF-contaminated wastewater | 53 ± 13–3,650 ± 710 mg/L | 90% removal in 2 h with 50% TOC removal | Laboratory scale | Vecitis et al. (2010) | |
Ultrasound (354–612 kHz) | PFOA, PFOS | DI water and groundwater below a landfill | ∼100 μg/L | Rate constant reduced by 56–61% in groundwater | Laboratory scale | Cheng et al. (2008) | |
Plasma-based treatment | PFOA, PFOS | DI water | 8.3 mg/L | Complete removal in 120 min | Laboratory scale | Singh et al. (2019) | |
Plasma-based treatment | Five long-chain, six short-chain PFAAs and eight PFAA precursors | Landfill leachate | 102–3,000 ng/L | Both PFOS and PFOA were removed by 90% in 10–75 min. Other long- and short-chain PFAAs were removed by >99% | Laboratory scale | Singh et al. (2020a) | |
Plasma-based treatment | Short- and long-chain PFAAs | Still bottom wastewater | ∼0.01–100 mg/L | >99% of short- and long-chain PFAAs were degraded in 2–6 h | Laboratory scale | Singh et al. (2020b) | |
Emerging technologies | Photocatalysis with needle-like Ga2O3 | PFOA | Municipal wastewater influent | 500 μg/L | 100% PFOA degradation was achieved in 180 min which was much longer compared to ultrapure water | Laboratory scale | Shao et al. (2013b) |
Photocatalysis in the presence of In2O3 catalyst | PFOA | Municipal wastewater effluent | 100 μmol/L | While 69% PFOA was degraded in pure water within 180 min, the efficiency was reduced to only 10% in wastewater, however, with pH adjustment and ozone addition similar PFOA degradation (69%) was achieved | Laboratory scale | Li et al. (2012) | |
Photocatalysis in the presence of In2O3 catalyst | PFOA | Simulated municipal wastewater | 100 mg/L | PFOA degradation was 97.6% with a complete defluorination at pH 2 | Laboratory scale | Jiang et al. (2016) | |
Electro assisted MWNTs | PFOA, PFOS | DI water with ionic strength | 100 μg/L | 92% | Laboratory scale | Li et al. (2011a) | |
Organo-clay (matCARETM) | PFOS | AFFF-contaminated wastewater | 0.6 mmol/L | 0.09 mmol/L adsorption capacity | Laboratory scale | Das et al. (2013) | |
Organo-clay (matCARETM) | PFOA, PFOS | Municipal wastewater influent | 0.04–0.02 mmol/L | Complete removal | Full scale | Arias Espana et al. (2015) | |
Photocatalysis with sheaf-like Ga2O3 | PFOA | Municipal wastewater effluent | 500 μg/L | 81% removal within 3 h with 66% defluorination, 100% after adjusting pH to 4.3 | Laboratory scale | Shao et al. (2013a) | |
COF | PFOA, PFOS, GenX and other PFAS | DI water | 100 μg/L | > 90% | Laboratory scale | Ji et al. (2018) | |
COF | GenX and HFPO-TA | DI water | 0.0756 mmol/L | 100% for HFPO-TA and 80% for GenX | Laboratory scale | Wang et al. (2020c) | |
COF | 16 PFAS including PFBA, PFBS, and GenX | Industrial wastewater effluent | 1,000 ng/L | Fast removal kinetics in 60–120 min with no desorption in 24 h | Laboratory scale | Ateia et al. (2019b) | |
MOF | PFOS | DI water | 1–100 mM | 100% | Laboratory scale | Barpaga et al. (2019) | |
MOF | PFOA and PFOS | DI water | 100–1,000 mg/L | > 90% | Laboratory scale | Sini et al. (2018) |