Sanitation access over time (former subscribers only) (n = 288)
| . | Respondent count (% of subscribers); value change, p-value . | . | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Before subscribing to EkoLakayx . | Upon terminating subscription . | At the time of interview . | ||||||
| Private improved sanitation | 88 | (31%) | 164 | (57%) | 176 | (61%) | |||
| Difference from the ‘Pre-EkoLakay' stage | 26% | p =2.53 × 10−16*** | 31% | p =1.34 × 10−19*** | |||||
| Difference from the previous stage | 4% | p = 0.003** | |||||||
| Non-private improved sanitation | 102 | (35%) | 73 | (25%) | 69 | (24%) | |||
| Difference from the ‘Pre-EkoLakay' Stage | −10% | p =2.85 × 10−4*** | −11% | p =9.48 × 10−5*** | |||||
| Difference from the previous stage | −1% | p = 0.395 | |||||||
| Open defecation | 99 | (34%) | 53 | (18%) | 48 | (17%) | |||
| Difference from the ‘Pre-EkoLakay' Stage | −16% | p = 3.41 × 10−9*** | −18% | p = 1.19 × 10−10*** | |||||
| Difference from the previous stage | −2% | p = 0.132 | |||||||
| . | Respondent count (% of subscribers); value change, p-value . | . | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Before subscribing to EkoLakayx . | Upon terminating subscription . | At the time of interview . | ||||||
| Private improved sanitation | 88 | (31%) | 164 | (57%) | 176 | (61%) | |||
| Difference from the ‘Pre-EkoLakay' stage | 26% | p =2.53 × 10−16*** | 31% | p =1.34 × 10−19*** | |||||
| Difference from the previous stage | 4% | p = 0.003** | |||||||
| Non-private improved sanitation | 102 | (35%) | 73 | (25%) | 69 | (24%) | |||
| Difference from the ‘Pre-EkoLakay' Stage | −10% | p =2.85 × 10−4*** | −11% | p =9.48 × 10−5*** | |||||
| Difference from the previous stage | −1% | p = 0.395 | |||||||
| Open defecation | 99 | (34%) | 53 | (18%) | 48 | (17%) | |||
| Difference from the ‘Pre-EkoLakay' Stage | −16% | p = 3.41 × 10−9*** | −18% | p = 1.19 × 10−10*** | |||||
| Difference from the previous stage | −2% | p = 0.132 | |||||||
The bold figures report a significant increase from the previous row.
The italic figures report a significant decrease from the previous row.
The p-values are the result of a paired t-test with 254 df; H0: μd = 0, where μd is the difference in subscribers using a given sanitation type at two stages in the sanitation arc; HA: μd≠0.
The row sums may exceed the respondent count, as respondents could report multiple household sanitation options.
*Significant at 0.05 level; **significant at 0.01 level; ***significant at 0.001 level.