Table 3
Odds of citing economic challenges among reasons for ending EkoLakay subscription, by post-subscription household sanitation (n = 309)
| Odds ratio (95% CI); p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Open defecation (n = 55) | Non-private improved sanitation (n = 75) | Private improved sanitation (n = 171) | |
| Economic challenges (n = 96) | 4.66 (2.53–8.59) | 3.56 (2.06–6.15) | 0.11 (0.06–0.19) |
| p = 4.86 × 10−7*** | p = 6.00e × 10−6*** | p =7.71e × 10−10*** | |
| Odds ratio (95% CI); p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Open defecation (n = 55) | Non-private improved sanitation (n = 75) | Private improved sanitation (n = 171) | |
| Economic challenges (n = 96) | 4.66 (2.53–8.59) | 3.56 (2.06–6.15) | 0.11 (0.06–0.19) |
| p = 4.86 × 10−7*** | p = 6.00e × 10−6*** | p =7.71e × 10−10*** | |
The bold values indicate a response occurring more frequently than would occur in a random distribution.
The italic values indicate a response occurring less frequently than would occur in a random distribution.
The p-values are the result of Pearson's χ2 test between the sample and all other respondent–response combinations (1 df); test statistic: 
, where s2 is the sample variance and σ2 is the population variance; H0: σ2 = σ20; HA: σ2≠σ20.
*Significant at 0.05 level; **significant at 0.01 level; ***significant at 0.001 level.