Analysis grid
Dimensions . | Indicators . | Weight (%) . | Score (%) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Not met (0) . | Met to a low degree (25) . | Met acceptably (50) . | Met to a high degree (75) . | Fully met (100) . | |||
Economic | Self-financing capacity | 17.84 | Bad | / | / | / | Good |
Financial autonomy | 11.35 | Bad | / | / | / | Good | |
Total coast recovery | 4.85 | Between 0 and 25 | Between 25 and 50 | Between 50 and 75 | Between 75 and 100 | ||
Environmental | Water quality | 7.18 | Bad | / | Doubtful | / | Good |
Water availability | 4.57 | 0 | Less than 5 l/d/capita | 5–20 l/d/capita | / | Over 20 l/d/capita | |
Climate risk | 2.89 | Category C | / | Category B | / | Category A | |
Social | Affordability | 6.20 | Too expensive | / | / | / | Fair |
Accessibility | 3.95 | More than 60 mn | / | 10–30 mn | / | Less than 10 min | |
Non-discrimination and equity | 2.50 | Lack of fair access rules for water services | / | / | / | Fair access rules for water services | |
Technical | Quality of construction | 2.96 | Bad | / | Average | / | Good |
Frequency of maintenance operations | 6.16 | Never done | Annually | Semi-annually | Quarterly | Monthly | |
Access to spare parts | 6.54 | Lack of spare parts in the council | / | Spare parts available in the council | / | Spare parts available in the village | |
Reliability of water system | 4.29 | Uncertain | / | Reliable | / | Very reliable | |
Institutional | Post-construction support to council | 1.63 | Lack of support to council | / | / | / | Existence of support to council |
Post-construction support to service managers | 1.63 | Not existent | / | Limited | Average | Good | |
Regulation | 0.85 | Bad | / | / | / | Good | |
Formalization of contract | 0.72 | Lack of contract between WPC and council | / | / | / | Existence of contract between WPC and council | |
Organisation of the service | 0.80 | Bad | / | / | / | Good | |
Governance | Skills of water service managers | 2.59 | Bad | / | Average | / | Good |
Financial flow management | 4.09 | Bad | / | Average | / | Good | |
Participation | 6.42 | Never | Annually | Quarterly | Monthly | Weekly |
Dimensions . | Indicators . | Weight (%) . | Score (%) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Not met (0) . | Met to a low degree (25) . | Met acceptably (50) . | Met to a high degree (75) . | Fully met (100) . | |||
Economic | Self-financing capacity | 17.84 | Bad | / | / | / | Good |
Financial autonomy | 11.35 | Bad | / | / | / | Good | |
Total coast recovery | 4.85 | Between 0 and 25 | Between 25 and 50 | Between 50 and 75 | Between 75 and 100 | ||
Environmental | Water quality | 7.18 | Bad | / | Doubtful | / | Good |
Water availability | 4.57 | 0 | Less than 5 l/d/capita | 5–20 l/d/capita | / | Over 20 l/d/capita | |
Climate risk | 2.89 | Category C | / | Category B | / | Category A | |
Social | Affordability | 6.20 | Too expensive | / | / | / | Fair |
Accessibility | 3.95 | More than 60 mn | / | 10–30 mn | / | Less than 10 min | |
Non-discrimination and equity | 2.50 | Lack of fair access rules for water services | / | / | / | Fair access rules for water services | |
Technical | Quality of construction | 2.96 | Bad | / | Average | / | Good |
Frequency of maintenance operations | 6.16 | Never done | Annually | Semi-annually | Quarterly | Monthly | |
Access to spare parts | 6.54 | Lack of spare parts in the council | / | Spare parts available in the council | / | Spare parts available in the village | |
Reliability of water system | 4.29 | Uncertain | / | Reliable | / | Very reliable | |
Institutional | Post-construction support to council | 1.63 | Lack of support to council | / | / | / | Existence of support to council |
Post-construction support to service managers | 1.63 | Not existent | / | Limited | Average | Good | |
Regulation | 0.85 | Bad | / | / | / | Good | |
Formalization of contract | 0.72 | Lack of contract between WPC and council | / | / | / | Existence of contract between WPC and council | |
Organisation of the service | 0.80 | Bad | / | / | / | Good | |
Governance | Skills of water service managers | 2.59 | Bad | / | Average | / | Good |
Financial flow management | 4.09 | Bad | / | Average | / | Good | |
Participation | 6.42 | Never | Annually | Quarterly | Monthly | Weekly |