IWA Publishing

Table 2

Pearson correlation coefficients between different predictor variables and ET₀ for Urmia and Tabriz stations

Station	Variable	ET₀	T	P	RH	U	SR
Tabriz	ET₀	1.000
	T	0.970	1.000
	P	− 0.673	− 0.601	1.000
	RH	− 0.907	− 0.926	0.567	1.000
	U	0.769	0.721	− 0.719	− 0.737	1.000
	SR	0.894	0.882	− 0.668	− 0.838	0.758	1.000
Urmia	ET₀	1
	T	0.933	1
	P	− 0.728	− 0.640	1
	RH	− 0.845	− 0.858	0.649	1
	U	0.250	0.243	− 0.411	− 0.365	1
	SR	0.867	0.808	− 0.627	− 0.764	0.129	1

Station	Variable	ET₀	T	P	RH	U	SR
Tabriz	ET₀	1.000
	T	0.970	1.000
	P	− 0.673	− 0.601	1.000
	RH	− 0.907	− 0.926	0.567	1.000
	U	0.769	0.721	− 0.719	− 0.737	1.000
	SR	0.894	0.882	− 0.668	− 0.838	0.758	1.000
Urmia	ET₀	1
	T	0.933	1
	P	− 0.728	− 0.640	1
	RH	− 0.845	− 0.858	0.649	1
	U	0.250	0.243	− 0.411	− 0.365	1
	SR	0.867	0.808	− 0.627	− 0.764	0.129	1

The bold number indicates significant correlations at a 5% level (p < 0.05).