Number of documents exhibiting different levels of evidence on corrective measures, incentives, and sanctions
| . | Urban . | Rural . | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question topica . | Strong evidence . | Weak evidence . | No evidence . | Strong evidence . | Weak evidence . | No evidence . |
| A – Sanctions for non-compliance | 10 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 11 |
| B – Sanctions effective | 7 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 11 |
| C – Complaint mechanisms | 1 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 11 |
| Total | 18 | 18 | 27 | 16 | 14 | 33 |
| . | Urban . | Rural . | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question topica . | Strong evidence . | Weak evidence . | No evidence . | Strong evidence . | Weak evidence . | No evidence . |
| A – Sanctions for non-compliance | 10 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 11 |
| B – Sanctions effective | 7 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 11 |
| C – Complaint mechanisms | 1 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 11 |
| Total | 18 | 18 | 27 | 16 | 14 | 33 |
aA: What provisions are in place for corrective management or for imposing legal sanctions for non-compliance through enforcement, fines, or charges? B: Are these considered contextually relevant or adequate to incentivise alignment, investment, or practice change? C: Can communities and stakeholders trigger investigations and sanctions through complaints mechanisms and whistle-blowing?