Skip to Main Content

Table 2 illustrates the results of partitioning BWSN_Network2 using WDN-Partition in comparison with other approaches.

Table 2

Comparison of the results of partitioning BWSN_Network2

 DMAsNDLT5000ST500CSMetersAExpANRWAPA
Original network – – – –   – 0.84 30.71 – 
Murray et al. (2009)  43 163 53 1,996 0.802 31.51 11 
Diao et al. (2013)  41 NA NA 2,044 NA 32.01 
Ferrari et al. (2014)  32–43 53–132 NA 1,863 0.82–0.81 31.04–31.62 
WDN-Partition 28–48 66–161 56–78 1,415–2,423 0.83–0.72 31.01–33.14 
 DMAsNDLT5000ST500CSMetersAExpANRWAPA
Original network – – – –   – 0.84 30.71 – 
Murray et al. (2009)  43 163 53 1,996 0.802 31.51 11 
Diao et al. (2013)  41 NA NA 2,044 NA 32.01 
Ferrari et al. (2014)  32–43 53–132 NA 1,863 0.82–0.81 31.04–31.62 
WDN-Partition 28–48 66–161 56–78 1,415–2,423 0.83–0.72 31.01–33.14 

DMAs: number of identified sectors; ND: number of sectors not directly connected to source; LT5000: number of sectors larger than 5,000 customer connections; ST500: number of sectors smaller than 500 customer connections; CS: cut size; Meters: number of meters that should be installed; AExp: average number of customer connections per sector; ANR: average network resilience; WA: average water age during the last 24 hours; PA: number of pipes added to the network.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal