This case study is a real problem which consists of designing a part of the water distribution system of the city of João Pessoa, in Brazil, known as Grande Setor WDN, and was first used by Gomes
et al. (2009).
Figure 1 presents the network topology. There are one reservoir, eight pipes linking six demand nodes, two loops, and a hydraulic pump with a water catchment level of 30 m, responsible for pumping water to the reservoir. Table 1 presents the nodes and pipe elevation, demand, and pipe lengths. Table 2 presents 10 commercial available diameters, costs, and the Hazen–Williams roughness coefficients. The costs were provided by Gomes
et al. (2009) in R$ and converted to USD (USD 1 = R$ 2). For comparison effects, we used the same cost values as used in the paper. Lower and upper bounds for the water velocity are 0.2 and 3 m/s and the minimum required pressure in the nodes demand is 25 m. The pump efficiency is considered 75% in the pump stations and the number of operation hours is 7,300 h/year. The energy cost is 0.1 US$/kWh, the annual interest rate is 12%, and the annual increase rate in the energy is 6%, for a lifetime of 20 years. The Hazen–Williams equation is used and two distinct values for the parameter
α were used:
Table 1Nodes and pipes for the Grande Setor WDN
Node/Pipe
. | Elevation (m)
. | Demand (L/s)
. | Pipe length (m)
. |
---|
1 | 6.0 | 0.00 | 2,540 |
2 | 5.5 | 47.78 | 1,230 |
3 | 5.5 | 80.32 | 1,430 |
4 | 6.0 | 208.60 | 1,300 |
5 | 4.5 | 43.44 | 1,490 |
6 | 4.0 | 40.29 | 1,210 |
7 | | | 1,460 |
8 | | | 1,190 |
Node/Pipe
. | Elevation (m)
. | Demand (L/s)
. | Pipe length (m)
. |
---|
1 | 6.0 | 0.00 | 2,540 |
2 | 5.5 | 47.78 | 1,230 |
3 | 5.5 | 80.32 | 1,430 |
4 | 6.0 | 208.60 | 1,300 |
5 | 4.5 | 43.44 | 1,490 |
6 | 4.0 | 40.29 | 1,210 |
7 | | | 1,460 |
8 | | | 1,190 |
Table 2Available diameters for the Grande Setor WDN
Diameter (m)
. | Cost (US$/m)
. | Roughness coefficient
. | Diameter (m)
. | Cost (US$/m)
. | Roughness coefficient
. |
---|
0.1084 | 23.55 | 145 | 0.3662 | 158.93 | 130 |
0.1564 | 31.90 | 145 | 0.4164 | 187.50 | 130 |
0.2042 | 43.81 | 145 | 0.4666 | 218.12 | 130 |
0.2520 | 59.30 | 145 | 0.5180 | 257.80 | 130 |
0.2998 | 76.12 | 145 | 0.6196 | 320.15 | 130 |
Diameter (m)
. | Cost (US$/m)
. | Roughness coefficient
. | Diameter (m)
. | Cost (US$/m)
. | Roughness coefficient
. |
---|
0.1084 | 23.55 | 145 | 0.3662 | 158.93 | 130 |
0.1564 | 31.90 | 145 | 0.4164 | 187.50 | 130 |
0.2042 | 43.81 | 145 | 0.4666 | 218.12 | 130 |
0.2520 | 59.30 | 145 | 0.5180 | 257.80 | 130 |
0.2998 | 76.12 | 145 | 0.6196 | 320.15 | 130 |