The silhouette analysis for the 1980–2020 period with the resulting optimum method and number of clusters (highlighted in bold and italics)
Cluster period . | Distance method . | Silhoutte information . | Cluster members . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 . | 4 . | 5 . | 6 . | 7 . | 8 . | |||
1980–2020 | Squared Euclidean | Average silhouette value | 0.412 | 0.387 | 0.398 | 0.402 | 0.392 | 0.316 |
Number of negative value | 56 | 44 | 32 | 25 | 33 | 30 | ||
Cosine | Average silhouette value | 0.260 | 0.277 | 0.287 | 0.282 | 0.268 | 0.255 | |
Number of negative value | 7 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 6 | ||
Cityblock | Average silhouette value | 0.243 | 0.233 | 0.249 | 0.135 | 0.184 | 0.160 | |
Number of negative value | 36 | 36 | 29 | 39 | 32 | 24 | ||
Correlation | Average silhouette value | 0.228 | 0.266 | 0.280 | 0.253 | 0.249 | 0.247 | |
Number of negative value | 9 | 17 | 16 | 14 | 9 | 13 |
Cluster period . | Distance method . | Silhoutte information . | Cluster members . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 . | 4 . | 5 . | 6 . | 7 . | 8 . | |||
1980–2020 | Squared Euclidean | Average silhouette value | 0.412 | 0.387 | 0.398 | 0.402 | 0.392 | 0.316 |
Number of negative value | 56 | 44 | 32 | 25 | 33 | 30 | ||
Cosine | Average silhouette value | 0.260 | 0.277 | 0.287 | 0.282 | 0.268 | 0.255 | |
Number of negative value | 7 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 6 | ||
Cityblock | Average silhouette value | 0.243 | 0.233 | 0.249 | 0.135 | 0.184 | 0.160 | |
Number of negative value | 36 | 36 | 29 | 39 | 32 | 24 | ||
Correlation | Average silhouette value | 0.228 | 0.266 | 0.280 | 0.253 | 0.249 | 0.247 | |
Number of negative value | 9 | 17 | 16 | 14 | 9 | 13 |
Silhouette plots based on cosine distance metric (left) and the visualization of clustered data for the period of 1980–2020 with n-clusters =5 (right).
Silhouette plots based on cosine distance metric (left) and the visualization of clustered data for the period of 1980–2020 with n-clusters =5 (right).