Number of clusters identified for each 10-year sub-period
No. . | Period . | Number of clusters . | Distance method . |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1980–1989 | 4 | Cosine distance |
2 | 1990–1999 | 6 | Cosine distance |
3 | 2000–2009 | 6 | Correlation distance |
4 | 2010–2020 | 7 | Cosine distance |
No. . | Period . | Number of clusters . | Distance method . |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1980–1989 | 4 | Cosine distance |
2 | 1990–1999 | 6 | Cosine distance |
3 | 2000–2009 | 6 | Correlation distance |
4 | 2010–2020 | 7 | Cosine distance |
Silhouette plots based on cosine and correlation distance metrics (left) and visualization of clustered data for the period of (a) 1980–1984 with n-clusters = 6; (b)1985 = 1989 with n-clusters = 5; (c)1990 = 1994 with n-clusters = 4; (d)1995 = 1999 with n-clusters = 5; (e) 2000–2004 with n-clusters = 5; (f) 2005–2009 with n-clusters = 5; (g) 2010–2014 with n-clusters = 5; and (h) 2015–2020 with n-clusters = 4.
Silhouette plots based on cosine and correlation distance metrics (left) and visualization of clustered data for the period of (a) 1980–1984 with n-clusters = 6; (b)1985 = 1989 with n-clusters = 5; (c)1990 = 1994 with n-clusters = 4; (d)1995 = 1999 with n-clusters = 5; (e) 2000–2004 with n-clusters = 5; (f) 2005–2009 with n-clusters = 5; (g) 2010–2014 with n-clusters = 5; and (h) 2015–2020 with n-clusters = 4.