Skip to Main Content

Later, these two latent variables are linked using a path diagram, demonstrating a strong impact with a greater significant value on each other (0.85 and 0.21). Among 10 latent variables, water misuse during the shower (y1), washing dishes (y4), toilet flushing (y5), cleaning food (y8), and water misuse during pool refilling (y9) variables are the most significant. That means that during a shower, washing dishes, toilet flushing, cleaning food and while refilling the pool, water is wasted, which causes the water crisis in Dhaka city. In addition, among six variables under the ‘natural crisis’ latent variable, the pump capacity (y13) variable is the most significant one. After connecting ‘personal misuse’ latent variables with overuse and misuse, the endogenous variables of mismanagement, unfair pricing, and ecosystem loss showed statistical significance. Again, the ‘natural crisis’ latent variable that connected with unfair pricing and ecosystem loss (endogenous variables) also showed higher statistical significance. All the path co-efficient values are shown in Table 5. This result represents the overall outcome of the hypothesis testing the water crisis using SEM. Table 6 displays the fit indices for the SEM.

Table 5

Path co-efficient of the structural equation model

Item no.Variable categoryDescriptionNotationPath co-efficient
Endogenous observed variables Misuse of water during shower y1 0.75 
Misuse of water during laundry y2 0.61 
Misuse of water during cooking y3 0.45 
Misuse of water during washing dishes y4 0.70 
Misuse of water during toilet flushing y5 0.75 
Misuse of water during washing car y6 0.32 
Misuse of water during watering in the garden y7 0.21 
Misuse of water during cleaning food y8 0.89 
Misuse of water during pool refilling y9 0.94 
10 Misuse of water during tank refilling y10 0.13 
11 Leakage of water tap y11 0.55 
12 Ground water layer depletion y12 0.42 
13 Pump capacity y13 1.23 
14 Increase of salinity y14 0.37 
15 Drying of river bed y15 0.21 
16 Climate changing y16 0.36 
17 Overuse and misuse of water y17 0.61 
18 Mismanagement y18 0.37 
19 Unfair pricing y19 0.09 
20 Ecosystem loss y20 0.74 
21 Latent variables Personal misuse η0.85 
22 Natural crisis η0.21 
23 Dependent variable Water crisis N/A 
Item no.Variable categoryDescriptionNotationPath co-efficient
Endogenous observed variables Misuse of water during shower y1 0.75 
Misuse of water during laundry y2 0.61 
Misuse of water during cooking y3 0.45 
Misuse of water during washing dishes y4 0.70 
Misuse of water during toilet flushing y5 0.75 
Misuse of water during washing car y6 0.32 
Misuse of water during watering in the garden y7 0.21 
Misuse of water during cleaning food y8 0.89 
Misuse of water during pool refilling y9 0.94 
10 Misuse of water during tank refilling y10 0.13 
11 Leakage of water tap y11 0.55 
12 Ground water layer depletion y12 0.42 
13 Pump capacity y13 1.23 
14 Increase of salinity y14 0.37 
15 Drying of river bed y15 0.21 
16 Climate changing y16 0.36 
17 Overuse and misuse of water y17 0.61 
18 Mismanagement y18 0.37 
19 Unfair pricing y19 0.09 
20 Ecosystem loss y20 0.74 
21 Latent variables Personal misuse η0.85 
22 Natural crisis η0.21 
23 Dependent variable Water crisis N/A 
Table 6

Fitness of the structural equation model

CFINFITLIPNFIRMSEAχ2dfχ2/df
0.969 0.958 0.941 0.338 0.033 481.941 175 2.75 
CFINFITLIPNFIRMSEAχ2dfχ2/df
0.969 0.958 0.941 0.338 0.033 481.941 175 2.75 

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal