The REA method was applied to assign weights to the top five GCMs corresponding to three time slices (2020–2049, 2050–2079, and 2070–2099) and RCPs 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, respectively, and these weights are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.
Weights assigned to each of the selected top five GCMs for different time slices corresponding to the RCP 4.5 scenario
GCM/Year . | NOrESM1-M . | bcc-csm1-1 . | CNRM-CM5 . | MIROC-ESM . | GFDL-CM3 . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020–2049 | 0.1655 | 0.2194 | 0.2383 | 0.2074 | 0.1694 |
2050–2079 | 0.1713 | 0.2407 | 0.2176 | 0.2080 | 0.1623 |
2070–2099 | 0.1422 | 0.2406 | 0.2625 | 0.1886 | 0.1661 |
GCM/Year . | NOrESM1-M . | bcc-csm1-1 . | CNRM-CM5 . | MIROC-ESM . | GFDL-CM3 . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020–2049 | 0.1655 | 0.2194 | 0.2383 | 0.2074 | 0.1694 |
2050–2079 | 0.1713 | 0.2407 | 0.2176 | 0.2080 | 0.1623 |
2070–2099 | 0.1422 | 0.2406 | 0.2625 | 0.1886 | 0.1661 |
Weights assigned to each of the selected top five GCMs for different time slices corresponding to the RCP 8.5 scenario
GCM/Year . | NOrESM1-M . | bcc-csm1-1 . | CNRM-CM5 . | MIROC-ESM . | GFDL-CM3 . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020–2049 | 0.1179 | 0.1103 | 0.5224 | 0.1379 | 0.1116 |
2050–2079 | 0.2129 | 0.232 | 0.1991 | 0.1870 | 0.1691 |
2070–2099 | 0.1385 | 0.2426 | 0.2102 | 0.1826 | 0.2261 |
GCM/Year . | NOrESM1-M . | bcc-csm1-1 . | CNRM-CM5 . | MIROC-ESM . | GFDL-CM3 . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020–2049 | 0.1179 | 0.1103 | 0.5224 | 0.1379 | 0.1116 |
2050–2079 | 0.2129 | 0.232 | 0.1991 | 0.1870 | 0.1691 |
2070–2099 | 0.1385 | 0.2426 | 0.2102 | 0.1826 | 0.2261 |