In the treatment effects models of latrine sales, statistically significant effects on latrine sales were observed for IDPoor households specifically, and across villages as a whole, but not for Non-IDPoor households. When subsidies were offered, latrine sales increased overall by 14.3%, and by 16.9 and 14.7% among IDPoor1 and IDPoor2 households, respectively (Table 1). The finding that subsidies did not alter demand among non-IDPoor households is also confirmed by the model (p > 0.1; Table 1) and supports results from the literature (Hoo et al. 2022). These results highlight the strong impact that targeted latrine subsidies can have on latrine sales to poor households without impacting sales to non-poor households.