Results of annual and seasonal rainfall, discharges and runoff coefficient analysis using Mann–Kendall's test
Variables . | Annual . | Spring . | Summer . | Autumn . | Winter . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p-value . | Evolution . | p-value . | Evolution . | p-value . | Evolution . | p-value . | Evolution . | p-value . | Evolution . | |
Rainfall | 0.03547 | – | 0.03877 | – | 0.32 | + | 0.08 | – | 0.147 | – |
Discharges | 0.3782 | – | 0.008722 | – | 0.4246 | – | 0.8688 | – | 0.8418 | – |
Ke | 0.6645 | + | 0.01127 | – | 0.1909 | – | 0.4488 | + | 0.3018 | – |
Variables . | Annual . | Spring . | Summer . | Autumn . | Winter . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p-value . | Evolution . | p-value . | Evolution . | p-value . | Evolution . | p-value . | Evolution . | p-value . | Evolution . | |
Rainfall | 0.03547 | – | 0.03877 | – | 0.32 | + | 0.08 | – | 0.147 | – |
Discharges | 0.3782 | – | 0.008722 | – | 0.4246 | – | 0.8688 | – | 0.8418 | – |
Ke | 0.6645 | + | 0.01127 | – | 0.1909 | – | 0.4488 | + | 0.3018 | – |
Note: The ‘ + ’ and ‘–’ signs indicate positive and negative trends, respectively. Calculated p-values below the significance level (α = 0.05) indicate that there is a significant trend in the series.
Ke, runoff coefficient.
Deviations (%) of the decadal annual and seasonal averages of precipitation, discharges and runoff coefficients compared to their interannual mean scores in the studied basin
Variables . | Decades . | Annual . | Spring . | Summer . | Autumn . | Winter . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precipitation | 1950 | 2.5 | 7.3 | −21.5 | 4 | 14.1 |
1960 | 3.8 | 2.5 | −2.2 | 4 | 27.3 | |
1970 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.8 | −0.2 | 8.9 | |
1980 | −2.7 | −3.9 | 11.8 | −3.4 | −27.0 | |
1990 | −2.7 | −6.5 | 11.4 | −1.6 | −19.4 | |
2000 | 1 | 0.1 | 2 | 1.2 | 1.9 | |
2010 | −3.0 | 0.4 | −6 | −4.8 | −9.1 | |
Discharges | 1950 | −5 | 9 | −0.5 | −14.4 | −4.3 |
1960 | 17.6 | 25.9 | 20.4 | 12.7 | 15.9 | |
1970 | −4.2 | −1 | −14.2 | 0.5 | −12.1 | |
1980 | 1.5 | −4.5 | −9.3 | 8.4 | −1.5 | |
1990 | − | − | − | − | − | |
2000 | −7.4 | −15.6 | −1 | −4.4 | −10.9 | |
2010 | −2.8 | −12.3 | −2.1 | −5.6 | 9.8 | |
Ke | 1950 | −9.9 | 8.3 | 46.1 | −31.2 | −13.0 |
1960 | 7.2 | 24 | 12.7 | 5.2 | 6 | |
1970 | −7.2 | −3.2 | −18.8 | 16.5 | −11.2 | |
1980 | 14 | 6.9 | −32.3 | 32.3 | 17 | |
1990 | − | − | − | − | − | |
2000 | −13.8 | −16.1 | −11.2 | −10.5 | −13.9 | |
2010 | 9.9 | −14.0 | 7.6 | −8.4 | 18 |
Variables . | Decades . | Annual . | Spring . | Summer . | Autumn . | Winter . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precipitation | 1950 | 2.5 | 7.3 | −21.5 | 4 | 14.1 |
1960 | 3.8 | 2.5 | −2.2 | 4 | 27.3 | |
1970 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.8 | −0.2 | 8.9 | |
1980 | −2.7 | −3.9 | 11.8 | −3.4 | −27.0 | |
1990 | −2.7 | −6.5 | 11.4 | −1.6 | −19.4 | |
2000 | 1 | 0.1 | 2 | 1.2 | 1.9 | |
2010 | −3.0 | 0.4 | −6 | −4.8 | −9.1 | |
Discharges | 1950 | −5 | 9 | −0.5 | −14.4 | −4.3 |
1960 | 17.6 | 25.9 | 20.4 | 12.7 | 15.9 | |
1970 | −4.2 | −1 | −14.2 | 0.5 | −12.1 | |
1980 | 1.5 | −4.5 | −9.3 | 8.4 | −1.5 | |
1990 | − | − | − | − | − | |
2000 | −7.4 | −15.6 | −1 | −4.4 | −10.9 | |
2010 | −2.8 | −12.3 | −2.1 | −5.6 | 9.8 | |
Ke | 1950 | −9.9 | 8.3 | 46.1 | −31.2 | −13.0 |
1960 | 7.2 | 24 | 12.7 | 5.2 | 6 | |
1970 | −7.2 | −3.2 | −18.8 | 16.5 | −11.2 | |
1980 | 14 | 6.9 | −32.3 | 32.3 | 17 | |
1990 | − | − | − | − | − | |
2000 | −13.8 | −16.1 | −11.2 | −10.5 | −13.9 | |
2010 | 9.9 | −14.0 | 7.6 | −8.4 | 18 |
Evolution of rainfall, discharges and runoff coefficients of the Nyong catchment at annual and seasonal time steps, according to the Pettitt test. The continuous horizontal lines in orange colour indicate the interannual averages. Decreases and surpluses are calculated compared to the whole period average. Please refer to the online version of this paper to see this figure in colour: http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2023.116.
Evolution of rainfall, discharges and runoff coefficients of the Nyong catchment at annual and seasonal time steps, according to the Pettitt test. The continuous horizontal lines in orange colour indicate the interannual averages. Decreases and surpluses are calculated compared to the whole period average. Please refer to the online version of this paper to see this figure in colour: http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2023.116.