115 experimental data for dynamic scour depth and 114 experimental data for static scour depth were acquired from previous research (Rajaratnam 1982; Aderibigbe & Rajaratnam 1996; Ansari 1999; Ansari et al. 2003; Chakravarti et al. 2014; Amin et al. 2021; Kartal & Emiroglu 2021; Chen et al. 2022; Shakya et al. 2022). Previous studies have shown that for long-impinging jets, scour depth varies logarithmically with non-dimensional parameters, whereas it varies linearly for short-impinging jets (Aderibigbe & Rajaratnam 1996; Beltaos & Rajaratnam 1977; Amin et al. 2021). We divided the data into two parts based on the impinging height, i.e., short-impinging jet and long-impinging jet , respectively. The range of the initial parameters used in the previous studies to predict static and dynamic scour depths is shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Range of parameters taken by researchers to estimate the scour characteristics

S. no.AuthorsNozzle dia. (mm)Jet height (cm)Jet velocity (m/s)Median size D50 (mm)
Aderibigbe & Rajaratnam (1996)  4–12 4–52.3 2.65–4.45 0.88–2.42 
Ansari et al. (2003)  8–12.5 15–30 1.3–5.75 0.27 
Chakravarti et al. (2014)  8–12.5 15–30 5.12–9.84 2.8 
Amin et al. (2021)  12.5 0–50 2.12–2.61 0.54–1.10 
Kartal & Emiroglu (2021)  10–20 2–24 10–23 1.28 
Shakya et al. (2022)  16.2 5–32 1.57–3.94 0.84–3.38 
Chen et al. (2022)  8–12 5–45 1.105–7.184 2.54 
S. no.AuthorsNozzle dia. (mm)Jet height (cm)Jet velocity (m/s)Median size D50 (mm)
Aderibigbe & Rajaratnam (1996)  4–12 4–52.3 2.65–4.45 0.88–2.42 
Ansari et al. (2003)  8–12.5 15–30 1.3–5.75 0.27 
Chakravarti et al. (2014)  8–12.5 15–30 5.12–9.84 2.8 
Amin et al. (2021)  12.5 0–50 2.12–2.61 0.54–1.10 
Kartal & Emiroglu (2021)  10–20 2–24 10–23 1.28 
Shakya et al. (2022)  16.2 5–32 1.57–3.94 0.84–3.38 
Chen et al. (2022)  8–12 5–45 1.105–7.184 2.54 

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal