In the mathematical models, the parameters need to be optimized for the given catchment area and give the maximum efficiency in terms of goodness-of-fit statistics. The SOLVER tool is used for optimization, which uses the Generalized Reduced Gradient (GRG) non-linear method of optimization (Hirpurkar & Ghare 2015). The initial values and optimized values of all parameters are shown in Table 2.
Optimized parameters of different mathematical models
S. No. . | Method . | Parameter . | Initial value . | Optimized value . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | SCS-CN with λ optimization | λ | Initial abstraction ratio | 0.2 | 0.037 |
2. | MS | fc | Minimum infiltration rate | 1 | 0.02 |
S | Amount of potential maximum retention in soil | 125 | 41.95 | ||
3. | MVP | α | Coefficient for initial soil moisture | 0.01 | 0.22 |
β | Coefficient for threshold soil moisture | 0.01 | 0.02 | ||
S | Amount of potential maximum retention in soil | 125 | 217.5 | ||
4. | ASMA-SCS-CN | α | Coefficient for initial soil moisture | 0.01 | 0.11 |
β | Coefficient for threshold soil moisture | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
fc | Minimum infiltration rate | 1 | 0.1 | ||
S | Amount of potential maximum retention in soil | 125 | 109 |
S. No. . | Method . | Parameter . | Initial value . | Optimized value . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | SCS-CN with λ optimization | λ | Initial abstraction ratio | 0.2 | 0.037 |
2. | MS | fc | Minimum infiltration rate | 1 | 0.02 |
S | Amount of potential maximum retention in soil | 125 | 41.95 | ||
3. | MVP | α | Coefficient for initial soil moisture | 0.01 | 0.22 |
β | Coefficient for threshold soil moisture | 0.01 | 0.02 | ||
S | Amount of potential maximum retention in soil | 125 | 217.5 | ||
4. | ASMA-SCS-CN | α | Coefficient for initial soil moisture | 0.01 | 0.11 |
β | Coefficient for threshold soil moisture | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
fc | Minimum infiltration rate | 1 | 0.1 | ||
S | Amount of potential maximum retention in soil | 125 | 109 |