Table 2 shows the regression analysis of the relationship between the most appropriate non-potable use and effective methods for providing exposure to the use of reclaimed water. The responses on the most appropriate non-potable use of reclaimed water are influenced by gender and level of education as well as the difficulties faced during water supply disruptions (p-value <0.05). The highest choice is to use reclaimed water for watering plants (87%), cleaning purposes such as cleaning the yard and drain (83%), toilet flushing (82%), car washing (57%), and the least favoured option was storage for emergency (31%), as shown in Figure 7. Other studies have shown that people are more willing to use recycled water for reasons other than drinking (Boyer et al., 2012). For example, a study conducted in Australia by Dolnicar & Schäfer (2009) found that communities strongly support the use of recycled water for non-drinking purposes such as toilet pumps (90%), gardening (89%), firefighting (86%), field irrigation (82%), and vehicle washing (79%).